These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3177380)

  • 21. Correcting for nonrandom ascertainment in generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), fitted using Gibbs sampling.
    Burton PR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 12508253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rheumatic fever susceptibility in four ascertainments: regressive segregation on a geometric ascertainment pattern.
    Sit KH
    J Hered; 1990; 81(6):428-33. PubMed ID: 2250095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A two-stage approach to the correction of ascertainment bias in complex genetic studies involving variance components.
    Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton PR
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):220-9. PubMed ID: 17354286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ascertainment models incorporating effects of variable age of onset.
    Dawson DV
    Am J Med Genet; 1994 Dec; 53(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 7864043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A family study of panic disorder: reanalysis using a regressive logistic model that incorporates a sibship environment.
    Hopper JL; Judd FK; Derrick PL; Macaskill GT; Burrows GD
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 2338231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A cooperative binomial ascertainment model.
    Ginsburg EKh; Axenovich TI
    Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Nov; 51(5):1156-60. PubMed ID: 1415257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimating parameters of the family-size distribution in ascertainment sampling schemes: numerical results.
    Ewens WJ; Asaba B
    Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 6487724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sampling correction in linkage analysis.
    Ginsburg E; Malkin I; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 27(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15305325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ascertainment adjustment: where does it take us?
    Burton PR; Palmer LJ; Jacobs K; Keen KJ; Olson JM; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Dec; 67(6):1505-14. PubMed ID: 11078478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sample-size calculations in segregation analysis.
    Wong FL; Rotter JI
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Nov; 36(6):1279-97. PubMed ID: 6517052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of implicit parameters in segregation analysis.
    Tai JJ; Hsiao CK
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(4):192-8. PubMed ID: 11287740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correcting for Ascertainment.
    Ewens W; Elston RC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():211-232. PubMed ID: 28980248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Estimation methods in a sampling survey].
    Warszawski J; Lellouch J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1997 Apr; 45(2):150-68. PubMed ID: 9221444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assumptions for different ascertainment models in human genetics.
    Williams JS; Stene J
    Biometrics; 1977 Sep; 33(3):523-7. PubMed ID: 911972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetic ascertainment with heterogeneous risk.
    Murphy EA; Meyers DA; Rohde CA
    Am J Med Genet; 1987 Jul; 27(3):669-82. PubMed ID: 3631138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of genetic effects in multiple cases family studies using penalized maximum likelihood methodology.
    Tsonaka R; De Visser MC; Houwing-Duistermaat J
    Biostatistics; 2013 Apr; 14(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 22989557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of proband designation on segregation analysis.
    Greenberg DA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1986 Sep; 39(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 3766539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The estimation of phenotype distributions from pedigree data.
    Winter RM
    Am J Med Genet; 1980; 7(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 7211963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficient designs and analysis of two-phase studies with longitudinal binary data.
    Di Gravio C; Schildcrout JS; Tao R
    Biometrics; 2024 Jan; 80(1):. PubMed ID: 38364804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical approaches for meta-analysis of genetic mutation prevalence.
    Hujoel MLA; Parmigiani G; Braun D
    Genet Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 45(2):154-170. PubMed ID: 33000511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.