231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31774527)
1. The Loci of Behavioral Evolution: Evidence That Fas2 and tilB Underlie Differences in Pupation Site Choice Behavior between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
Pischedda A; Shahandeh MP; Turner TL
Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Mar; 37(3):864-880. PubMed ID: 31774527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of the Genetic Architecture Underlying Eye Size Variation Within
Gaspar P; Arif S; Sumner-Rooney L; Kittelmann M; Bodey AJ; Stern DL; Nunes MDS; McGregor AP
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Mar; 10(3):1005-1018. PubMed ID: 31919111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The genetic basis of female pheromone differences between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
Pardy JA; Rundle HD; Bernards MA; Moehring AJ
Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Jan; 122(1):93-109. PubMed ID: 29777168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of a genetic network for an ecologically relevant behavioural phenotype in Drosophila melanogaster.
Zhang W; Reeves GR; Tautz D
Mol Ecol; 2020 Feb; 29(3):502-518. PubMed ID: 31867742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential responses to artificial selection on oviposition site preferences in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
Soto EM; Betti MI; Hurtado J; Hasson E
Insect Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(6):821-8. PubMed ID: 25263841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phenotype-dependent habitat choice is too weak to cause assortative mating between Drosophila melanogaster strains differing in light sensitivity.
Peralta-Rincón JR; Aoulad FZ; Prado A; Edelaar P
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0234223. PubMed ID: 33057335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic divergence and adaptive convergence in
Kang L; Rashkovetsky E; Michalak K; Garner HR; Mahaney JE; Rzigalinski BA; Korol A; Nevo E; Michalak P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jun; 116(24):11839-11844. PubMed ID: 31127048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolution of Mechanisms that Control Mating in Drosophila Males.
Ahmed OM; Avila-Herrera A; Tun KM; Serpa PH; Peng J; Parthasarathy S; Knapp JM; Stern DL; Davis GW; Pollard KS; Shah NM
Cell Rep; 2019 May; 27(9):2527-2536.e4. PubMed ID: 31141679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population genetic analysis of autophagy and phagocytosis genes in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
Im JH; Lazzaro BP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205024. PubMed ID: 30281656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative population genomics of latitudinal variation in Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.
Machado HE; Bergland AO; O'Brien KR; Behrman EL; Schmidt PS; Petrov DA
Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(3):723-40. PubMed ID: 26523848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Light-dependent pupation site preferences in Drosophila. II. Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
Manning M; Markow TA
Behav Genet; 1981 Nov; 11(6):557-63. PubMed ID: 6803758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A reanalysis of protein polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana: effects of population size and selection.
Morton RA; Choudhary M; Cariou ML; Singh RS
Genetica; 2004 Mar; 120(1-3):101-14. PubMed ID: 15088651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic and behavioral analysis of natural variation in Drosophila melanogaster pupation position.
Riedl CA; Riedl M; Mackay TF; Sokolowski MB
Fly (Austin); 2007; 1(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 18690058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Genetics of Male Pheromone Preference Difference Between
Shahandeh MP; Pischedda A; Rodriguez JM; Turner TL
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Jan; 10(1):401-415. PubMed ID: 31748379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of increased larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster without increased larval feeding rate.
Sarangi M; Nagarajan A; Dey S; Bose J; Joshi A
J Genet; 2016 Sep; 95(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 27659320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolution of Plasticity in Response to Ethanol between Sister Species with Different Ecological Histories (
Signor SA
Am Nat; 2020 Nov; 196(5):620-633. PubMed ID: 33064591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic Evolution of Euchromatic Satellites on the X Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and the simulans Clade.
Sproul JS; Khost DE; Eickbush DG; Negm S; Wei X; Wong I; Larracuente AM
Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Aug; 37(8):2241-2256. PubMed ID: 32191304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolution of a central neural circuit underlies Drosophila mate preferences.
Seeholzer LF; Seppo M; Stern DL; Ruta V
Nature; 2018 Jul; 559(7715):564-569. PubMed ID: 29995860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A survey of intra- and interspecific variation for pupation height in Drosophila.
Markow TA
Behav Genet; 1979 May; 9(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 115457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pupariation site preference within and between Drosophila sibling species.
Erezyilmaz DF; Stern DL
Evolution; 2013 Sep; 67(9):2714-27. PubMed ID: 24033178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
