These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31775578)

  • 1. Pupillometry as an Objective Measure of Sustained Attention in Young and Older Listeners.
    Zhao S; Bury G; Milne A; Chait M
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519887815. PubMed ID: 31775578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory attention switching with listening difficulty: Behavioral and pupillometric measures.
    McCloy DR; Larson E; Lee AKC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2764. PubMed ID: 30522295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pupil Dilation and Microsaccades Provide Complementary Insights into the Dynamics of Arousal and Instantaneous Attention during Effortful Listening.
    Contadini-Wright C; Magami K; Mehta N; Chait M
    J Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 43(26):4856-4866. PubMed ID: 37127361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of background speech on attentive sound processing: A pupil dilation study.
    Ríos-López P; Widmann A; Aurelie-Bidet-Caulet ; Wetzel N
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Apr; 174():47-56. PubMed ID: 35150772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual Variations in Effort: Assessing Pupillometry for the Hearing Impaired.
    Wagner AE; Nagels L; Toffanin P; Opie JM; Başkent D
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519845596. PubMed ID: 31131729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of age and task difficulty on ERP responses to novel sounds presented during a speech-perception-in-noise test.
    Bertoli S; Bodmer D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):360-368. PubMed ID: 25840528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of reward and task demand in value-based strategic allocation of auditory comprehension effort.
    Zhang M; Siegle GJ; McNeil MR; Pratt SR; Palmer C
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107775. PubMed ID: 31401432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task.
    Wang Y; Naylor G; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Wendt D; Ohlenforst B; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 29117062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Application of Pupillometry in Hearing Science to Assess Listening Effort.
    Naylor G; Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518799437. PubMed ID: 30208763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
    Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task.
    Zhang Y; Lehmann A; Deroche M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0233251. PubMed ID: 33657100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel sounds as a psychophysiological measure of listening effort in older listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Bertoli S; Bodmer D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 May; 125(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 24216383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupillometry reveals changes in physiological arousal during a sustained listening task.
    McGarrigle R; Dawes P; Stewart AJ; Kuchinsky SE; Munro KJ
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Feb; 54(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 27731503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An exploratory Study of EEG Alpha Oscillation and Pupil Dilation in Hearing-Aid Users During Effortful listening to Continuous Speech.
    Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Wendt D; Alickovic E; Whitmer WM; Lunner T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235782. PubMed ID: 32649733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB; Moore AN
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.
    Van Engen KJ; McLaughlin DJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():56-66. PubMed ID: 29801981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.