204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31776470)
1. Track Structure Study for Energy Dependency of Electrons and X-rays on DNA Double-Strand Break Induction.
Yachi Y; Yoshii Y; Matsuya Y; Mori R; Oikawa J; Date H
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17649. PubMed ID: 31776470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid MCNP simulation of DNA double strand break (DSB) relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for photons, neutrons, and light ions.
Stewart RD; Streitmatter SW; Argento DC; Kirkby C; Goorley JT; Moffitt G; Jevremovic T; Sandison GA
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8249-74. PubMed ID: 26449929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relation between DNA double-strand breaks and energy spectra of secondary electrons produced by different X-ray energies.
Freneau A; Dos Santos M; Voisin P; Tang N; Bueno Vizcarra M; Villagrasa C; Roy L; Vaurijoux A; Gruel G
Int J Radiat Biol; 2018 Dec; 94(12):1075-1084. PubMed ID: 30257122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage induction by x-rays and selected radioisotopes.
Hsiao Y; Stewart RD
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):233-44. PubMed ID: 18182699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of Radio-Induced Damage in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with 40 kVp, 220 kVp, and 4 MV X-rays by Means of Micro and Nanodosimetric Calculations.
Tang N; Bueno M; Meylan S; Perrot Y; Tran HN; Freneau A; Dos Santos M; Vaurijoux A; Gruel G; Bernal MA; Bordage MC; Emfietzoglou D; Francis Z; Guatelli S; Ivanchenko V; Karamitros M; Kyriakou I; Shin WG; Incerti S; Villagrasa C
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 31835321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation of DSB yield for high LET radiation.
Friedrich T; Durante M; Scholz M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Sep; 166(1-4):61-5. PubMed ID: 25883306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the consistency of Monte Carlo track structure DNA damage simulations.
Pater P; Seuntjens J; El Naqa I; Bernal MA
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121708. PubMed ID: 25471955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of radiation quality and oxygen on clustered DNA lesions and cell death.
Stewart RD; Yu VK; Georgakilas AG; Koumenis C; Park JH; Carlson DJ
Radiat Res; 2011 Nov; 176(5):587-602. PubMed ID: 21823972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microdosimetric analysis of various mammography spectra: lineal energy distributions and ionization cluster analysis.
Verhaegen F; Reniers B
Radiat Res; 2004 Nov; 162(5):592-9. PubMed ID: 15624315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are all photon radiations similar in large absorbers?--a comparison of electron spectra.
Kellerer AM; Roos H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15695239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling Radiation Effects of Ultrasoft X Rays on the Basis of Amorphous Track Structure.
Buch T; Scifoni E; Krämer M; Durante M; Scholz M; Friedrich T
Radiat Res; 2018 Jan; 189(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 29073360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Analytical Method for Quantifying the Yields of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Coupled with Strand Breaks by γ-H2AX Focus Formation Assay Based on Track-Structure Simulation.
Yachi Y; Matsuya Y; Yoshii Y; Fukunaga H; Date H; Kai T
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36674901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relation between lineal energy distribution and relative biological effectiveness for photon beams according to the microdosimetric kinetic model.
Okamoto H; Kanai T; Kase Y; Matsumoto Y; Furusawa Y; Fujita Y; Saitoh H; Itami J; Kohno T
J Radiat Res; 2011; 52(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 21160135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA Dosimeter Measurement of Relative Biological Effectiveness for 160 kVp and 6 MV X Rays.
Li X; McConnell KA; Che J; Ha CS; Lee SE; Kirby N; Shim EY
Radiat Res; 2020 Aug; 194(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 32845988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative biological effectiveness for photons: implication of complex DNA double-strand breaks as critical lesions.
Liang Y; Fu Q; Wang X; Liu F; Yang G; Luo C; Ouyang Q; Wang Y
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2153-2175. PubMed ID: 28054514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA double strand break (DSB) induction and cell survival in iodine-enhanced computed tomography (CT).
Streitmatter SW; Stewart RD; Jenkins PA; Jevremovic T
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(15):6164-6184. PubMed ID: 28703119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative biological effectiveness of high linear energy transfer α-particles for the induction of DNA-double-strand breaks, chromosome aberrations and reproductive cell death in SW-1573 lung tumour cells.
Franken NA; Hovingh S; Ten Cate R; Krawczyk P; Stap J; Hoebe R; Aten J; Barendsen GW
Oncol Rep; 2012 Mar; 27(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 22200791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in Chinese hamster V79-4 cells irradiated with characteristic aluminum K and copper L ultrasoft X rays.
Botchway SW; Stevens DL; Hill MA; Jenner TJ; O'Neill P
Radiat Res; 1997 Oct; 148(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 9339947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA double-strand break misrejoining after exposure of primary human fibroblasts to CK characteristic X rays, 29 kVp X rays and 60Co gamma rays.
Kühne M; Urban G; Frankenberg D; Löbrich M
Radiat Res; 2005 Nov; 164(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 16238445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of the radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks number by considering cell cycle and absorbed dose per cell nucleus.
Mori R; Matsuya Y; Yoshii Y; Date H
J Radiat Res; 2018 May; 59(3):253-260. PubMed ID: 29800455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
