203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31776709)
41. Spontaneous pre-labour rupture of membranes at term: immediate versus delayed induction of labour.
Omole-Ohonsi A; Ashimi A; Adeleke S
West Afr J Med; 2009 May; 28(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 20306730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: A population-based study using coarsened exact matching.
Blanc-Petitjean P; Carbonne B; Deneux-Tharaux C; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Le Ray C;
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 33(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 31342567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cervical ripening by prostaglandin E2 in patients with a previous cesarean section.
Bouchghoul H; Zeino S; Houllier M; Senat MV
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 49(4):101699. PubMed ID: 32018044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Observational Study of Neonatal Safety for Outpatient Labour Induction Priming with Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert.
Cundiff GW; Simpson ML; Koenig N; Lee T
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 May; 39(5):354-360. PubMed ID: 28363606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Cervical ripening at term with repeated administration of dinoprostone vaginal pessary].
Petrovic Barbitch M; Gnisci A; Marcelli M; Capelle M; Guidicelli B; Cravello L; Gamerre M; Agostini A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013 Jun; 41(6):346-50. PubMed ID: 23562543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Outcomes of mifepristone usage for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy. Randomized controlled trial.
Baev OR; Rumyantseva VP; Tysyachnyu OV; Kozlova OA; Sukhikh GT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Oct; 217():144-149. PubMed ID: 28898687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A model to predict delivery time following induction of labor at term with a dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study.
Huang F; Chen H; Wu X; Li J; Guo J; Zhang X; Qiao Y
Ir J Med Sci; 2024 Jun; 193(3):1343-1350. PubMed ID: 37947994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.
Maier JT; Metz M; Watermann N; Li L; Schalinski E; Gauger U; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28672756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E
Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Patients Not Responsive to a First Dose of Dinoprostone: A Randomized Prospective Study.
Antonazzo P; Laoreti A; Personeni C; Grossi E; Martinelli A; Cetin I
Reprod Sci; 2016 Jun; 23(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 26626794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Prostaglandins in the induction of labor at term with premature rupture of fetal membranes].
Milasinović L; Vuleta P; Radeka G; Petrović D; Orelj M
Med Pregl; 1997; 50(5-6):175-80. PubMed ID: 9297047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Foley catheter vs prostaglandin as ripening agent in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes.
Mackeen AD; Walker L; Ruhstaller K; Schuster M; Sciscione A
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Sep; 114(9):686-92. PubMed ID: 25170038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
