334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31777197)
1. Quantifying the impact of adherence to screening strategies on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.
D'Andrea E; Ahnen DJ; Sussman DA; Najafzadeh M
Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):824-836. PubMed ID: 31777197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM
JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Knudsen AB; Rutter CM; Peterse EFP; Lietz AP; Seguin CL; Meester RGS; Perdue LA; Lin JS; Siegel RL; Doria-Rose VP; Feuer EJ; Zauber AG; Kuntz KM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
JAMA; 2021 May; 325(19):1998-2011. PubMed ID: 34003219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes.
Fendrick AM; Fisher DA; Saoud L; Ozbay AB; Karlitz JJ; Limburg PJ
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2021 Sep; 14(9):845-850. PubMed ID: 34021023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population.
Ebner D; Kisiel J; Barnieh L; Sharma R; Smith NJ; Estes C; Vahdat V; Ozbay AB; Limburg P; Fendrick AM
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1219-1226. PubMed ID: 37752872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.
Piscitello A; Saoud L; Fendrick AM; Borah BJ; Hassmiller Lich K; Matney M; Ozbay AB; Parton M; Limburg PJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244431. PubMed ID: 33373409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guidelines: an extended look at multi-year interval testing.
Berger BM; Parton MA; Levin B
Am J Manag Care; 2016 Feb; 22(2):e77-81. PubMed ID: 26881323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.
Sharma T
Public Health; 2020 May; 182():70-76. PubMed ID: 32179290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Lin JS; Perdue LA; Henrikson NB; Bean SI; Blasi PR
JAMA; 2021 May; 325(19):1978-1998. PubMed ID: 34003220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of screening and follow-up colonoscopy adenoma sensitivity on colorectal cancer screening outcomes in the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.
Fisher DA; Saoud L; Hassmiller Lich K; Fendrick AM; Ozbay AB; Borah BJ; Matney M; Parton M; Limburg PJ
Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(8):2855-2864. PubMed ID: 33314646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(10):1-40. PubMed ID: 23074514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lowering the colorectal cancer screening age improves predicted outcomes in a microsimulation model.
Fisher DA; Saoud L; Finney Rutten LJ; Ozbay AB; Brooks D; Limburg PJ
Curr Med Res Opin; 2021 Jun; 37(6):1005-1010. PubMed ID: 33769894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Zhang J; Cheng Z; Ma Y; He C; Lu Y; Zhao Y; Chang X; Zhang Y; Bai Y; Cheng N
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Dec; 16(4):252-263. PubMed ID: 28687458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing vs Colonoscopy or Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native People.
Redwood DG; Dinh TA; Kisiel JB; Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Provost EM; Sacco FD; Tiesinga JJ; Ahlquist DA
Mayo Clin Proc; 2021 May; 96(5):1203-1217. PubMed ID: 33840520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
