These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31777197)

  • 1. Quantifying the impact of adherence to screening strategies on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.
    D'Andrea E; Ahnen DJ; Sussman DA; Najafzadeh M
    Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):824-836. PubMed ID: 31777197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Population health outcomes of blood-based screening for colorectal cancer in comparison to current screening modalities: insights from a discrete-event simulation model incorporating longitudinal adherence.
    Forbes SP; Yay Donderici E; Zhang N; Sharif B; Tremblay G; Schafer G; Raymond VM; Talasaz A; Eagle C; Das AK; Grady WM
    J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):991-1002. PubMed ID: 39037853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Knudsen AB; Rutter CM; Peterse EFP; Lietz AP; Seguin CL; Meester RGS; Perdue LA; Lin JS; Siegel RL; Doria-Rose VP; Feuer EJ; Zauber AG; Kuntz KM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    JAMA; 2021 May; 325(19):1998-2011. PubMed ID: 34003219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes.
    Fendrick AM; Fisher DA; Saoud L; Ozbay AB; Karlitz JJ; Limburg PJ
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2021 Sep; 14(9):845-850. PubMed ID: 34021023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population.
    Ebner D; Kisiel J; Barnieh L; Sharma R; Smith NJ; Estes C; Vahdat V; Ozbay AB; Limburg P; Fendrick AM
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1219-1226. PubMed ID: 37752872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.
    Piscitello A; Saoud L; Fendrick AM; Borah BJ; Hassmiller Lich K; Matney M; Ozbay AB; Parton M; Limburg PJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244431. PubMed ID: 33373409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guidelines: an extended look at multi-year interval testing.
    Berger BM; Parton MA; Levin B
    Am J Manag Care; 2016 Feb; 22(2):e77-81. PubMed ID: 26881323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.
    Sharma T
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():70-76. PubMed ID: 32179290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Lin JS; Perdue LA; Henrikson NB; Bean SI; Blasi PR
    JAMA; 2021 May; 325(19):1978-1998. PubMed ID: 34003220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(10):1-40. PubMed ID: 23074514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lowering the colorectal cancer screening age improves predicted outcomes in a microsimulation model.
    Fisher DA; Saoud L; Finney Rutten LJ; Ozbay AB; Brooks D; Limburg PJ
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2021 Jun; 37(6):1005-1010. PubMed ID: 33769894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of screening and follow-up colonoscopy adenoma sensitivity on colorectal cancer screening outcomes in the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.
    Fisher DA; Saoud L; Hassmiller Lich K; Fendrick AM; Ozbay AB; Borah BJ; Matney M; Parton M; Limburg PJ
    Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(8):2855-2864. PubMed ID: 33314646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang J; Cheng Z; Ma Y; He C; Lu Y; Zhao Y; Chang X; Zhang Y; Bai Y; Cheng N
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Dec; 16(4):252-263. PubMed ID: 28687458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.