313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31778148)
1. Struo: a pipeline for building custom databases for common metagenome profilers.
de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Ley RE; Youngblut ND
Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(7):2314-2315. PubMed ID: 31778148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Struo2: efficient metagenome profiling database construction for ever-expanding microbial genome datasets.
Youngblut ND; Ley RE
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12198. PubMed ID: 34616633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MIDAS2: Metagenomic Intra-species Diversity Analysis System.
Zhao C; Dimitrov B; Goldman M; Nayfach S; Pollard KS
Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36321886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MAGpy: a reproducible pipeline for the downstream analysis of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs).
Stewart RD; Auffret MD; Snelling TJ; Roehe R; Watson M
Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 35(12):2150-2152. PubMed ID: 30418481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MarkerMAG: linking metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) with 16S rRNA marker genes using paired-end short reads.
Song W; Zhang S; Thomas T
Bioinformatics; 2022 Aug; 38(15):3684-3688. PubMed ID: 35713513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MetaPOAP: presence or absence of metabolic pathways in metagenome-assembled genomes.
Ward LM; Shih PM; Fischer WW
Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 34(24):4284-4286. PubMed ID: 29939199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing and evaluating the reconstruction of Metagenome-assembled microbial genomes.
Papudeshi B; Haggerty JM; Doane M; Morris MM; Walsh K; Beattie DT; Pande D; Zaeri P; Silva GGZ; Thompson F; Edwards RA; Dinsdale EA
BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):915. PubMed ID: 29183281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DeepMAsED: evaluating the quality of metagenomic assemblies.
Mineeva O; Rojas-Carulla M; Ley RE; Schölkopf B; Youngblut ND
Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 36(10):3011-3017. PubMed ID: 32096824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. KMCP: accurate metagenomic profiling of both prokaryotic and viral populations by pseudo-mapping.
Shen W; Xiang H; Huang T; Tang H; Peng M; Cai D; Hu P; Ren H
Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36579886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ATLAS: a Snakemake workflow for assembly, annotation, and genomic binning of metagenome sequence data.
Kieser S; Brown J; Zdobnov EM; Trajkovski M; McCue LA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):257. PubMed ID: 32571209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. UProC: tools for ultra-fast protein domain classification.
Meinicke P
Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 31(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 25540185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Crowdsourced benchmarking of taxonomic metagenome profilers: lessons learned from the sbv IMPROVER Microbiomics challenge.
Poussin C; Khachatryan L; Sierro N; Narsapuram VK; Meyer F; Kaikala V; Chawla V; Muppirala U; Kumar S; Belcastro V; Battey JND; Scotti E; Boué S; McHardy AC; Peitsch MC; Ivanov NV; Hoeng J
BMC Genomics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):624. PubMed ID: 36042406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SOAPMetaS: profiling large metagenome datasets efficiently on distributed clusters.
He S; Huang Z; Wang X; Fang L; Li S; Zhang Y; Zhang G
Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 37(7):1021-1023. PubMed ID: 32766813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MetaMarker: a pipeline for de novo discovery of novel metagenomic biomarkers.
Koohi-Moghadam M; Borad MJ; Tran NL; Swanson KR; Boardman LA; Sun H; Wang J
Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3812-3814. PubMed ID: 30825371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MeCorS: Metagenome-enabled error correction of single cell sequencing reads.
Bremges A; Singer E; Woyke T; Sczyrba A
Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 32(14):2199-201. PubMed ID: 27153586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ARGs-OAP v2.0 with an expanded SARG database and Hidden Markov Models for enhancement characterization and quantification of antibiotic resistance genes in environmental metagenomes.
Yin X; Jiang XT; Chai B; Li L; Yang Y; Cole JR; Tiedje JM; Zhang T
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):2263-2270. PubMed ID: 29408954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metagenome SNP calling via read-colored de Bruijn graphs.
Alipanahi B; Muggli MD; Jundi M; Noyes NR; Boucher C
Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 36(22-23):5275-5281. PubMed ID: 32049324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. IHM-DB: a curated collection of metagenomics data from the Indian Himalayan Region, and automated pipeline for 16S rRNA amplicon-based analysis (AutoQii2).
Khatri A; Thakur A; Lepcha A; Acharya V; Kumar R
Database (Oxford); 2023 Jun; 2023():. PubMed ID: 37279783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data.
Aßhauer KP; Wemheuer B; Daniel R; Meinicke P
Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2882-4. PubMed ID: 25957349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fast and sensitive taxonomic assignment to metagenomic contigs.
Mirdita M; Steinegger M; Breitwieser F; Söding J; Levy Karin E
Bioinformatics; 2021 Sep; 37(18):3029-3031. PubMed ID: 33734313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
