317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31778824)
1. A commentary on "Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is not prognostic factor for 30-day mortality (a nationwide prospective cohort study)" (Int J Surg 2019; Epub ahead of print, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.017).
Karimian F
Int J Surg; 2020 Jan; 73():10-11. PubMed ID: 31778824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An Invited Commentary on "Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is not prognostic factor for 30-day mortality (a nationwide prospective cohort study)" [Int. J. Surg. 2019; Epub ahead of print].
Chiarello MM
Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():242-243. PubMed ID: 31765845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A Commentary on 'Preoperative pulmonary function tests do not predict the development of pulmonary complications after elective major abdominal surgery: A prospective cohort study' (Int J Surg 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.032 [Epub ahead of print]).
Chisthi MM
Int J Surg; 2020 Feb; 74():23-24. PubMed ID: 31883843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is not prognostic factor for 30-day mortality (a nationwide prospective cohort study).
Zogovic S; Bojesen AB; Andos S; Mortensen FV
Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():47-54. PubMed ID: 31639454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary on: Is the renal subcapsular space the preferred site for clinical porcine islet xenotransplantation? Review article (Int J Surg 2019 Jul 30;69:100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.07.032. [Epub ahead of print]).
Schuurman HJ; Graham ML
Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():47-48. PubMed ID: 31525501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.
Siu WT; Leong HT; Law BK; Chau CH; Li AC; Fung KH; Tai YP; Li MK
Ann Surg; 2002 Mar; 235(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 11882751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic duodenal ulcer.
Busić Z; Servis D; Slisurić F; Kristek J; Kolovrat M; Cavka V; Cavka M; Cupurdija K; Patrlj L; Kvesić A
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():279-81. PubMed ID: 20402333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open repair of perforated peptic ulcer].
Ding J; Liao GQ; Zhang ZM; Pan Y; Li DM; Wang RH; Xu KS; Yang XF; Yuan P; Wang SY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 14(10):785-9. PubMed ID: 22030778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without omental patch versus conventional open repair.
Ates M; Sevil S; Bakircioglu E; Colak C
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2007 Oct; 17(5):615-9. PubMed ID: 17907974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.
Lau H
Surg Endosc; 2004 Jul; 18(7):1013-21. PubMed ID: 15136924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique.
Lau WY; Leung KL; Kwong KH; Davey IC; Robertson C; Dawson JJ; Chung SC; Li AK
Ann Surg; 1996 Aug; 224(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 8757375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A commentary on "bedside ultrasonography for acute appendicitis: An updated diagnostic meta-analysis" (Int J Surg 2019 Aug 9;70:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.009. [Epub ahead of print]).
Coskun AK; Coskun ZY
Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():84. PubMed ID: 31561007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer].
Yasuda K; Kitano S
Nihon Rinsho; 2004 Mar; 62(3):519-23. PubMed ID: 15038097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An invited commentary on "Postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (Int J Surg 2019 Sep 30. pii: S1743-9191(19)30262-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.030. [Epub ahead of print]).
Moaven O
Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():91. PubMed ID: 31698091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Tan S; Wu G; Zhuang Q; Xi Q; Meng Q; Jiang Y; Han Y; Yu C; Yu Z; Li N
Int J Surg; 2016 Sep; 33 Pt A():124-32. PubMed ID: 27504848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.
Sanabria AE; Morales CH; Villegas MI
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD004778. PubMed ID: 16235381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Invited commentary on "postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Int J Surg. 2019 Sep 30. pii: S1743-9191(19)30262-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.030. [Epub ahead of print].
Baram A
Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():92. PubMed ID: 31698092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer.
Siu WT; Chau CH; Law BK; Tang CN; Ha PY; Li MK
Br J Surg; 2004 Apr; 91(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 15048752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer.
Matsuda M; Nishiyama M; Hanai T; Saeki S; Watanabe T
Ann Surg; 1995 Mar; 221(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 7717776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary on "Indicators of impending pig kidney and heart xenograft failure: Relevance to clinical organ xenotransplantation" (Int J Surg 2019;Aug 21. Pii: S1743-9191(19)30215-8. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.024. [Epub ahead of print]).
Bertera S
Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():41-42. PubMed ID: 31525502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
