167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31778908)
1. Reduction in maxillary complete denture deformation using framework material made by computer-aided design and manufacturing systems.
Hada T; Suzuki T; Minakuchi S; Takahashi H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103514. PubMed ID: 31778908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of a denture strengthener on the deformation of a maxillary complete denture.
Hirajima Y; Takahashi H; Minakuchi S
Dent Mater J; 2009 Jul; 28(4):507-12. PubMed ID: 19721290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Load-bearing capacity of novel resin-based fixed dental prosthesis materials.
Cekic-Nagas I; Egilmez F; Ergun G; Vallittu PK; Lassila LVJ
Dent Mater J; 2018 Jan; 37(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 29081445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Impact Strength and Flexural Strength of Polyether Ether Ketone vs. Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Materials: An In-Vitro Study.
Tushar ; Rani P; Ananya ; Kumar S; Prakash J; B JM
Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e47929. PubMed ID: 38046488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review of digital removable partial dentures. Part II: CAD/CAM framework, artificial teeth, and denture base.
Takaichi A; Fueki K; Murakami N; Ueno T; Inamochi Y; Wada J; Arai Y; Wakabayashi N
J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Jan; 66(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 33504722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Fit of Dentures Fabricated by Traditional Techniques Versus CAD/CAM Technology.
McLaughlin JB; Ramos V; Dickinson DP
J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):428-435. PubMed ID: 29136309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of printing direction on stress distortion of three-dimensional printed dentures using stereolithography technology.
Hada T; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103949. PubMed ID: 32957241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of CAD-CAM polymers for digitally fabricated complete dentures.
Perea-Lowery L; Minja IK; Lassila L; Ramakrishnaiah R; Vallittu PK
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):175-181. PubMed ID: 32063383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EFFECT OF IMMERSION IN WATER ON DEFORMATION WITH A VARIETY OF DENTURE BASE MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES.
Huang PJ; Wang TM; Lin LD; Yang TC
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; (3):123-135. PubMed ID: 37256258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of flexural strength and surface properties of prepolymerized CAD/CAM PMMA-based polymers used for digital 3D complete dentures.
Arslan M; Murat S; Alp G; Zaimoglu A
Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 29610779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of the Flexural and Impact Strengths and Flexural Modulus of CAD/CAM and Conventional Heat-Cured Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA).
Al-Dwairi ZN; Tahboub KY; Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ
J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):341-349. PubMed ID: 29896904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of leaching residual monomer and biological effects of four types of conventional and CAD/CAM dental polymers: an in vitro study.
Wei X; Pan Y; Wang M; Wang Y; Lin H; Jiang L; Lin D; Cheng H
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2887-2898. PubMed ID: 35083585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated fiber-reinforced composite denture retainers.
Nagata K; Wakabayashi N; Takahashi H; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(4):381-3. PubMed ID: 23837170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do CAD/CAM dentures really release less monomer than conventional dentures?
Steinmassl PA; Wiedemair V; Huck C; Klaunzer F; Steinmassl O; Grunert I; Dumfahrt H
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1697-1705. PubMed ID: 27704295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison of the Surface Properties of CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA).
Al-Dwairi ZN; Tahboub KY; Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Özcan M
J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):452-457. PubMed ID: 30730086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness.
Kalberer N; Mehl A; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):637-643. PubMed ID: 30711292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linear and volumetric wear of conventional and milled denture teeth.
Kim ST; Cook DR; Albouy JP; De Kok I; Sulaiman TA
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Apr; 34(3):519-526. PubMed ID: 35019205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of fabrication techniques on denture base adaptation: An in vitro study.
Hsu CY; Yang TC; Wang TM; Lin LD
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):740-747. PubMed ID: 32448642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of digitally fabricated trial dentures.
Wimmer T; Eichberger M; Lümkemann N; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jun; 119(6):942-947. PubMed ID: 28969915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dimensional changes of complete dentures fabricated by milled and printed techniques: An in vitro study.
Tsai FC; Yang TC; Wang TM; Lin LD
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):608-615. PubMed ID: 34364688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
