119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31780105)
1. Evaluation of the wear and retention performance of a shape-memory alloy abutment system after 6 months of clinical use.
Linsley CS; Chesnot P; Shah KC; Wu BM; Park J; Seo YR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):189-194. PubMed ID: 31780105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a shape memory implant abutment system: An up to 6-month pilot clinical study.
Shah KC; Linsley CS; Wu BM
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):257-263. PubMed ID: 31227233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.
Mehl C; Zhang Q; Lehmann F; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):214-219. PubMed ID: 29627210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns.
Covey DA; Kent DK; St Germain HA; Koka S
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 10709044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of retention of cemented laser-sintered crowns on unmodified straight narrow implant abutments.
Kilicarslan MA; Ozkan P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 23527338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.
Mehl C; Harder S; Shahriari A; Steiner M; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F
Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
