These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31780769)

  • 1. Access site complications following Impella-supported high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Johannsen L; Mahabadi AA; Totzeck M; Krueger A; Jánosi RA; Rassaf T; Al-Rashid F
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17844. PubMed ID: 31780769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Routine use of fluoroscopic guidance and up-front femoral angiography results in reduced femoral complications in patients undergoing coronary angiographic procedures: an observational study using an Interrupted Time-Series analysis.
    Castle EV; Rathod KS; Guttmann OP; Jenkins AM; McCarthy CD; Knight CJ; O'Mahony C; Mathur A; Smith EJ; Weerackody R; Timmis AD; Wragg A; Jones DA
    Heart Vessels; 2019 Mar; 34(3):419-426. PubMed ID: 30264266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of peri and post-procedural complications in patients undergoing revascularisation of coronary artery multivessel disease by coronary artery bypass grafting or protected percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device.
    Becher T; Baumann S; Eder F; Perschka S; Loßnitzer D; Fastner C; Behnes M; Doesch C; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2019 Jun; 8(4):360-368. PubMed ID: 28660768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Using Impella Ventricular Assist Device Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Single-Center Experience.
    Kneizeh K; Alnaimi A; Noterdaeme T; Schröder J; Altiok E; Marx N; Almalla M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Mar; 34(3):E196-E201. PubMed ID: 35058376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novel technique of performing multivessel PCI through an Impella sheath.
    Kumar K; Reddy S; Acharya D; Lotun K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):117-120. PubMed ID: 31696630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Real-world supported unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention with impella device; data from the USpella registry.
    Schreiber T; Wah Htun W; Blank N; Telila T; Mercado N; Briasoulis A; Kaki A; Kondur A; Munir A; Grines C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Oct; 90(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 28417594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-close technique of percutaneous closure for delayed hemostasis of large-bore femoral sheaths.
    Lata K; Kaki A; Grines C; Blank N; Elder M; Schreiber T
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 31(4):504-510. PubMed ID: 29405431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deploying Mechanical Circulatory Support Via the Axillary Artery in Cardiogenic Shock and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kajy M; Laktineh A; Blank N; Tayal R; Tanveer S; Mohamad T; Elder M; Schreiber T; Kaki A
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 128():127-133. PubMed ID: 32650906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Frequency of Vascular Complications With Ultrasound-Guided Versus Fluroscopic Roadmap-Guided Femoral Arterial Access in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
    Potluri SP; Hamandi M; Basra SS; Shinn KV; Tabachnick D; Vasudevan A; Filardo G; DiMaio JM; Brinkman WT; Harrington K; Squiers JJ; Szerlip MI; Brown DL; Holper E; Mack MJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 132():93-99. PubMed ID: 32782067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support with and without intra-aortic balloon in cardiogenic shock patients.
    Bhuiyan R; Bimal T; Fishbein J; Gandotra P; Selim S; Ong L; Gruberg L
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():68-73. PubMed ID: 37076412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-Risk "Protected" Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Mechanical Circulatory Support in a Non-Surgical Center - An Early Asian Experience.
    Li KFC; Ho HH; Jafary FH; Ong PJL
    Acta Cardiol Sin; 2020 Nov; 36(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 33235425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of inhospital mortality, length of hospitalization, costs, and vascular complications of percutaneous coronary interventions guided by ultrasound versus angiography.
    Singh V; Badheka AO; Arora S; Panaich SS; Patel NJ; Patel N; Pant S; Thakkar B; Chothani A; Deshmukh A; Manvar S; Lahewala S; Patel J; Patel S; Jhamnani S; Bhinder J; Patel P; Savani GT; Patel A; Mohamad T; Gidwani UK; Brown M; Forrest JK; Cleman M; Schreiber T; Grines C
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 May; 115(10):1357-66. PubMed ID: 25824542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions: the international, multicentre, randomised ULTRACOLOR Trial.
    Meijers TA; Nap A; Aminian A; Schmitz T; Dens J; Teeuwen K; van Kuijk JP; van Wely M; Bataille Y; Kraaijeveld AO; Roolvink V; Dambrink JE; Gosselink ATM; Hermanides RS; Ottervanger JP; Tsilingiris I; van den Buijs DMF; van Royen N; van Leeuwen MAH
    EuroIntervention; 2024 Jul; 20(14):e876-e886. PubMed ID: 38742577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Randomized Study of SheathLess vs Standard Guiding Catheters for Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Noble S; Tessitore E; Gencer B; Righini M; Robert-Ebadi H; Roffi M; Bonvini RF
    Can J Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1425-1432. PubMed ID: 27381263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study.
    O'Neill WW; Kleiman NS; Moses J; Henriques JP; Dixon S; Massaro J; Palacios I; Maini B; Mulukutla S; Dzavík V; Popma J; Douglas PS; Ohman M
    Circulation; 2012 Oct; 126(14):1717-27. PubMed ID: 22935569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Roadmap towards an institutional Impella programme for high-risk coronary interventions.
    Pietrasik A; Gąsecka A; Jasińska-Gniadzik K; Szwed P; Grygier M; Pawłowski T; Sacha J; Kochman J
    ESC Heart Fail; 2023 Aug; 10(4):2200-2213. PubMed ID: 37345215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Radial Artery Occlusion Following Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Sheath-based versus Sheathless Technique.
    Mohsen A; Alqasrawi M; Shantha GPS; DeZorzi C; Panaich S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12026. PubMed ID: 30104697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample.
    Dodoo SN; Kwapong YA; Agyemang-Sarpong A; Amoran E; Egolum UO; Ghasemzadeh N; Ramadan R; Henry G; Samady H
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 49(1 Pt A):102053. PubMed ID: 37640173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Major femoral vascular access complications after coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: A Danish register study.
    Dencker D; Pedersen F; Engstrøm T; Køber L; Højberg S; Nielsen MB; Schroeder TV; Lönn L
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 202():604-8. PubMed ID: 26447671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility and efficacy of the 2.5 L and 3.8 L impella percutaneous left ventricular support device during high-risk, percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
    Spiro J; Venugopal V; Raja Y; Ludman PF; Townend JN; Doshi SN
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 85(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 24408882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.