361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31783241)
21. Using a network of lower-cost monitors to identify the influence of modifiable factors driving spatial patterns in fine particulate matter concentrations in an urban environment.
Rose Eilenberg S; Subramanian R; Malings C; Hauryliuk A; Presto AA; Robinson AL
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):949-961. PubMed ID: 32764710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A distributed network of low-cost continuous reading sensors to measure spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 in Xi'an, China.
Gao M; Cao J; Seto E
Environ Pollut; 2015 Apr; 199():56-65. PubMed ID: 25618367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. New Calibration System for Low-Cost Suspended Particulate Matter Sensors with Controlled Air Speed, Temperature and Humidity.
Nieckarz Z; Zoladz JA
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 34502737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Two step calibration method for ozone low-cost sensor: Field experiences with the UrbanSense DCUs.
Sá JP; Chojer H; Branco PTBS; Alvim-Ferraz MCM; Martins FG; Sousa SIV
J Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 328():116910. PubMed ID: 36495826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A feasible experimental framework for field calibration of portable light-scattering aerosol monitors: Case of TSI DustTrak.
Li Z; Che W; Lau AKH; Fung JCH; Lin C; Lu X
Environ Pollut; 2019 Dec; 255(Pt 1):113136. PubMed ID: 31522000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laboratory Evaluation of Low-Cost Optical Particle Counters for Environmental and Occupational Exposures.
Sousan S; Regmi S; Park YM
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 34204182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM
Crnosija N; Levy Zamora M; Rule AM; Payne-Sturges D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 35742589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Non-linear probabilistic calibration of low-cost environmental air pollution sensor networks for neighborhood level spatiotemporal exposure assessment.
Patton A; Datta A; Zamora ML; Buehler C; Xiong F; Gentner DR; Koehler K
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):908-916. PubMed ID: 36352094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sources of error and variability in particulate matter sensor network measurements.
Zuidema C; Stebounova LV; Sousan S; Thomas G; Koehler K; Peters TM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2019 Aug; 16(8):564-574. PubMed ID: 31251121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Feasibility of using low-cost portable particle monitors for measurement of fine and coarse particulate matter in urban ambient air.
Han I; Symanski E; Stock TH
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):330-340. PubMed ID: 27690287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM
Bi J; Wildani A; Chang HH; Liu Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Feb; 54(4):2152-2162. PubMed ID: 31927908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Measuring Air Quality for Advocacy in Africa (MA3): Feasibility and Practicality of Longitudinal Ambient PM
Awokola BI; Okello G; Mortimer KJ; Jewell CP; Erhart A; Semple S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 33023037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intercomparison of PurpleAir Sensor Performance over Three Years Indoors and Outdoors at a Home: Bias, Precision, and Limit of Detection Using an Improved Algorithm for Calculating PM
Wallace L
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development of a multiple regression model to calibrate a low-cost sensor considering reference measurements and meteorological parameters.
Romero Y; Velásquez RMA; Noel J
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Jul; 192(8):498. PubMed ID: 32648052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Calibration Method for Particulate Matter Low-Cost Sensors Used in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring and Research.
Venkatraman Jagatha J; Klausnitzer A; Chacón-Mateos M; Laquai B; Nieuwkoop E; van der Mark P; Vogt U; Schneider C
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 34201377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An efficient spatiotemporal data calibration approach for the low-cost PM
Lee CH; Wang YB; Yu HL
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104838. PubMed ID: 31203027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of Air Quality Boxes Based on Low-Cost Sensor Technology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring.
Gäbel P; Koller C; Hertig E
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Advantages and challenges of the implementation of a low-cost particulate matter monitoring system as a decision-making tool.
Caquilpán P V; Aros G G; Elgueta A S; Díaz S R; Sepúlveda K G; Sierralta J C
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):667. PubMed ID: 31650385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors for coal dust monitoring.
Amoah NA; Xu G; Kumar AR; Wang Y
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Feb; 859(Pt 2):160336. PubMed ID: 36414053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
