These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31783282)
1. Biomechanics of alloplastic mandible reconstruction using biomaterials: The effect of implant design on stress concentration influences choice of material. Prasadh S; Suresh S; Hong KL; Bhargav A; Rosa V; Wong RCW J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103548. PubMed ID: 31783282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The modular endoprosthesis for mandibular body replacement. Part 2: finite element analysis of endoprosthesis reconstruction of the mandible. Wong RC; Tideman H; Merkx MA; Jansen J; Goh SM J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e487-97. PubMed ID: 22516866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis. Li P; Shen L; Li J; Liang R; Tian W; Tang W J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23541861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The feasibility of a custom-made endoprosthesis in mandibular reconstruction: Implant design and finite element analysis. Pinheiro M; Alves JL J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2116-28. PubMed ID: 26596361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The modular endoprosthesis for mandibular body replacement. Part 1: mechanical testing of the reconstruction. Wong RC; Tideman H; Merkx MA; Jansen J; Goh SM J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e479-86. PubMed ID: 22520832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design of a patient-specific mandible reconstruction implant with dental prosthesis for metal 3D printing using integrated weighted topology optimization and finite element analysis. Li CH; Wu CH; Lin CL J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 May; 105():103700. PubMed ID: 32279847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study. Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Topological optimization of 3D printed bone analog with PEKK for surgical mandibular reconstruction. Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Zhang JX; Jiang XF; Dong XT; Xu X J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jul; 107():103758. PubMed ID: 32279058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical behavior of mandibles reconstructed with fibular grafts at different vertical positions using finite element method. Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang JH; Jun JC; Jiang XF; Wang R; Baur DA J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 30482534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical validation of structural optimized patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate orienting additive manufacturing. Zhong S; Shi Q; Van Dessel J; Gu Y; Sun Y; Yang S; Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Sep; 224():107023. PubMed ID: 35872386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments]. Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Numerical study of the influence of material parameters on the mechanical behaviour of a rehabilitated edentulous mandible. Favot LM; Berry-Kromer V; Haboussi M; Thiebaud F; Ben Zineb T J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 24321295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element analysis of biplanar customized reconstruction plates for lateral and central segmental defects of mandible. Demir E; Yalçın G; Kalaycı A Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024; 27(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 36920278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical and Mechanostat analysis of a titanium layered porous implant for mandibular reconstruction: The effect of the topology optimization design. Peng WM; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Nizza M; Baur DA; Jiang XF; Dong XT Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 May; 124():112056. PubMed ID: 33947550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular reconstruction system reliability analysis using probabilistic finite element method. Kargarnejad S; Ghalichi F; Pourgol-Mohammad M; Garajei A Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Oct; 24(13):1437-1449. PubMed ID: 34657530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads]. Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]