299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31783315)
1. Modified lymph node ratio improves the prognostic predictive ability for breast cancer patients compared with other lymph node staging systems.
Jin ML; Gong Y; Pei YC; Ji P; Hu X; Shao ZM
Breast; 2020 Feb; 49():93-100. PubMed ID: 31783315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic Performance of Different Lymph Node Staging Systems After Curative Intent Resection for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
Spolverato G; Ejaz A; Kim Y; Squires MH; Poultsides G; Fields RC; Bloomston M; Weber SM; Votanopoulos K; Acher AW; Jin LX; Hawkins WG; Schmidt C; Kooby DA; Worhunsky D; Saunders N; Cho CS; Levine EA; Maithel SK; Pawlik TM
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):991-8. PubMed ID: 25563867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic accuracy of different lymph node staging system in predicting overall survival in stage IV colon cancer.
Han L; Mo S; Xiang W; Li Q; Wang R; Xu Y; Dai W; Cai G
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2020 Feb; 35(2):317-322. PubMed ID: 31858220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Axillary lymph node ratio and total number of removed lymph nodes: predictors of survival in stage I and II breast cancer.
van der Wal BC; Butzelaar RM; van der Meij S; Boermeester MA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2002 Aug; 28(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 12217299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ratio and log odds of positive lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with mastectomy.
Chen LJ; Chung KP; Chang YJ; Chang YJ
Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 26055316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic Implications of Lymph Node Status for Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.
Amini N; Kim Y; Wilson A; Margonis GA; Ethun CG; Poultsides G; Tran T; Idrees K; Isom CA; Fields RC; Krasnick B; Weber SM; Salem A; Martin RC; Scoggins C; Shen P; Mogal HD; Schmidt C; Beal E; Hatzaras I; Shenoy R; Maithel SK; Pawlik TM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):3016-23. PubMed ID: 27150440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The assessment of the optimal number of examined lymph nodes and prognostic models based on lymph nodes for predicting survival outcome in patients with stage N3b gastric cancer.
Guo S; Shang M; Dong Z; Zhang J; Wang Y; Zhao Y
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2021 Apr; 17(2):e117-e124. PubMed ID: 32762113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Defining an Optimal Prognostic Lymph Node Stratification Schema.
Kim Y; Spolverato G; Amini N; Margonis GA; Gupta R; Ejaz A; Pawlik TM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 22(8):2772-8. PubMed ID: 25663595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic accuracy of different lymph node staging systems in rectal adenocarcinoma with or without preoperative radiation therapy.
Shen F; Cui J; Cai K; Pan H; Bu H; Yu F
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jul; 48(7):625-632. PubMed ID: 29788392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of different lymph node staging systems in predicting prognosis and determining indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1-T2pN1 breast carcinoma.
Kustić D; Klarica Gembić T; Grebić D; Petretić Majnarić S; Nekić J
Strahlenther Onkol; 2020 Nov; 196(11):1044-1054. PubMed ID: 32710122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nodal status, number of lymph nodes examined, and lymph node ratio: what defines prognosis after resection of colon adenocarcinoma?
Gleisner AL; Mogal H; Dodson R; Efron J; Gearhart S; Wick E; Lidor A; Herman JM; Pawlik TM
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Dec; 217(6):1090-100. PubMed ID: 24045143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different lymph node staging systems for patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.
Zhou Z; Xie X; Hao N; Diao D; Song Y; Xia P; Dang C; Zhang H
Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 Jun; 34(6):963-970. PubMed ID: 29338535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nomograms predict survival of patients with lymph node-positive, luminal a breast cancer.
Li Y; Ma L
BMC Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(1):965. PubMed ID: 34454451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of four lymph node staging systems for predicting prognosis for stage IV rectum cancer.
Han L; Mo S; Xiang W; Li Q; Wang R; Xu Y; Dai W; Cai G
Ann Transl Med; 2020 Feb; 8(4):111. PubMed ID: 32175404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic Performance of Different Lymph Node Staging Systems in Patients With Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Jiang S; Zhao L; Xie C; Su H; Yan Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():402. PubMed ID: 32733379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Disease-free survival and prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in T1-T2 N positive breast cancer patients. A population registry-based study in a European country.
Martinez-Ramos D; Escrig-Sos J; Alcalde-Sanchez M; Torrella-Ramos A; Salvador-Sanchis JL
World J Surg; 2009 Aug; 33(8):1659-64. PubMed ID: 19488815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymph node status after resection for gallbladder adenocarcinoma: prognostic implications of different nodal staging/scoring systems.
Amini N; Spolverato G; Kim Y; Gupta R; Margonis GA; Ejaz A; Pawlik TM
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 111(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 25312786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparisons of different lymph node staging systems for predicting overall survival of node-positive patients with renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database.
Zheng W; Jiang W; Wu Q; Chen J; Zhang Z; Yu S; Guo C
BMJ Open; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e068044. PubMed ID: 37185648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Population-Based Study to Evaluate the Associations of Nodal Stage, Lymph Node Ratio and Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes with Survival in Patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma.
Batra A; Kong S; Hannouf MB; Cheung WY
Curr Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(3):1298-1308. PubMed ID: 35323310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
