These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31784021)

  • 1. Can 3D imaging and digital software increase the ability to predict dental arch form after orthodontic treatment?
    Hadadpour S; Noruzian M; Abdi AH; Baghban AA; Nouri M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):870-877. PubMed ID: 31784021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement of the clinician's choice of archwire selection on conventional and virtual models.
    Haddadpour S; Motamedian SR; Behnaz M; Asefi S; Bagheban AA; Abdi AH; Nouri M
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Jul; 89(4):597-604. PubMed ID: 30840496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective vs subjective analyses of arch form and preformed archwire selection.
    Nouri M; Asefi S; Akbarzadeh Baghban A; Ahmadvand M; Shamsa M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):543-54. PubMed ID: 27021459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commercially available archwire forms compared with normal dental arch forms in a Japanese population.
    Oda S; Arai K; Nakahara R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 20362913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital models: How can dental arch form be verified chairside?
    Tavares A; Braga E; Araújo TM
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):68-73. PubMed ID: 29364382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of the arch forms of male and female subjects with those of preformed rectangular nickel-titanium archwires.
    Bhowmik SG; Hazare PV; Bhowmik H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Sep; 142(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 22920703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agreement in the determination of preformed wire shape templates on plaster models and customized digital arch form diagrams on digital models.
    Camardella LT; Sá MDSB; Guimarães LC; Vilella BS; Vilella OV
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Mar; 153(3):377-386. PubMed ID: 29501113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of commercially available preformed archwires with average natural arch forms.
    Mughal AT; Jan A; Akhtar O; Ghaffar F; Shafique HZ; Shahid R
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2021 Nov; 71(11):2495-2500. PubMed ID: 34783724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of the prefabricated forms of NiTi archwires on orthodontic forces delivered to the mandibular dental arch.
    Tachi A; Tochigi K; Saze N; Arai K
    Prog Orthod; 2021 Dec; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 34850299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the shape of some popular nickel titanium alloy preformed arch wires.
    Braun S; Hnat WP; Leschinsky R; Legan HL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 10393574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in form of mandibular, light, round, preformed NiTi archwires.
    Saze N; Arai K
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Sep; 86(5):796-803. PubMed ID: 26991840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vivo study on the incidence and location of fracture in round orthodontic archwires.
    Guzman U; Jerrold L; Abdelkarim A
    J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 40(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 24297962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of conformity of preformed orthodontic archwires and dental arch form.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019; 24(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 30916248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation and agreement of a digital and conventional method to measure arch parameters.
    Nawi N; Mohamed AM; Marizan Nor M; Ashar NA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jan; 79(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 29116344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
    Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D technology to measure dental arches and create a template for lingual brackets technique.
    Kairalla SA; Cappellette M; Velasco L; Ferreira LS; Pignatari SSN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2021; 26(3):e2119234. PubMed ID: 34231831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental and alveolar arch forms in a Caucasian population compared with commercially available archwires.
    Lombardo L; Fattori L; Molinari C; Mirabella D; Siciliani G
    Int Orthod; 2013 Dec; 11(4):389-421. PubMed ID: 24269725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
    Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.