162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31784773)
1. The fate of urological systematic reviews registered in PROSPERO.
Khaleel S; Cleveland B; Kalapara A; Sathianathen N; Balaji P; Dahm P
World J Urol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):2981-2986. PubMed ID: 31784773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017.
Rombey T; Allers K; Mathes T; Hoffmann F; Pieper D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 30866832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers.
Tawfik GM; Giang HTN; Ghozy S; Altibi AM; Kandil H; Le HH; Eid PS; Radwan I; Makram OM; Hien TTT; Sherif M; Hossain AS; Thang TLL; Puljak L; Salem H; Numair T; Moji K; Huy NT
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):213. PubMed ID: 32842968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Half of systematic reviews about pain registered in PROSPERO were not published and the majority had inaccurate status.
Runjic E; Rombey T; Pieper D; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 116():114-121. PubMed ID: 31476376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols.
van der Braak K; Ghannad M; Orelio C; Heus P; Damen JAA; Spijker R; Robinson K; Lund H; Hooft L
Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):191. PubMed ID: 36064610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. More systematic reviews were registered in PROSPERO each year, but few records' status was up-to-date.
Rombey T; Doni K; Hoffmann F; Pieper D; Allers K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():60-67. PubMed ID: 31589953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inconsistencies in study eligibility criteria are common between non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their protocols registered in PROSPERO.
Hu K; Zhao L; Zhou Q; Mei F; Gao Q; Chen F; Jiang M; Zhao B; Zhang W; Kwong JSW; Ma Y; Mou C; Ma B
Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 33522101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
Viguera-Guerra I; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Montilla A; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Gómez-Arias PJ; Vélez García-Nieto A; Gómez-Garcia F; Isla-Tejera B
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211919. PubMed ID: 30811451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols.
Farrah K; Young K; Tunis MC; Zhao L
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):280. PubMed ID: 31730014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search.
Allers K; Hoffmann F; Mathes T; Pieper D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():102-110. PubMed ID: 29258907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (2016-2018).
Ding M; Soderberg L; Jung JH; Dahm P
Urology; 2020 Apr; 138():5-10. PubMed ID: 31954169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting.
Page MJ; Shamseer L; Tricco AC
Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 7(1):32. PubMed ID: 29463298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer-reviewed articles: an international survey.
Rombey T; Puljak L; Allers K; Ruano J; Pieper D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():9-17. PubMed ID: 32201257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of registered and published systematic reviews focusing on the prevention of COVID-19: a meta-research study.
Nothacker J; Stadelmaier J; Siemens W; Meerpohl JJ; Schmucker C
BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e060255. PubMed ID: 35534064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study.
Tsujimoto H; Tsujimoto Y; Kataoka Y
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Dec; 10(1):703. PubMed ID: 29208054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An assessment of the extent to which the contents of PROSPERO records meet the systematic review protocol reporting items in PRISMA-P.
Booth A; Mitchell AS; Mott A; James S; Cockayne S; Gascoyne S; McDaid C
F1000Res; 2020; 9():773. PubMed ID: 32850123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry.
Dos Santos MBF; Agostini BA; Bassani R; Pereira GKR; Sarkis-Onofre R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):57. PubMed ID: 32160871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study.
Tsujimoto Y; Tsutsumi Y; Kataoka Y; Tsujimoto H; Yamamoto Y; Papola D; Guyatt GH; Fukuhara S; Furukawa TA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():25-34. PubMed ID: 31276781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
