290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31785009)
1. Training intensity-dependent increases in corticospinal but not intracortical excitability after acute strength training.
Colomer-Poveda D; Hortobágyi T; Keller M; Romero-Arenas S; Márquez G
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2020 Apr; 30(4):652-661. PubMed ID: 31785009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contraction intensity-dependent variations in the responses to brain and corticospinal tract stimulation after a single session of resistance training in men.
Colomer-Poveda D; Romero-Arenas S; Lundbye-Jensen J; Hortobágyi T; Márquez G
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2019 Oct; 127(4):1128-1139. PubMed ID: 31436513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute Strength Training Increases Responses to Stimulation of Corticospinal Axons.
Nuzzo JL; Barry BK; Gandevia SC; Taylor JL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Jan; 48(1):139-50. PubMed ID: 26258855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tracking the corticospinal responses to strength training.
Mason J; Frazer AK; Avela J; Pearce AJ; Howatson G; Kidgell DJ
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2020 Apr; 120(4):783-798. PubMed ID: 32060740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-intensity, low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances excitability of the human corticospinal pathway.
D'Amico JM; Dongés SC; Taylor JL
J Neurophysiol; 2020 May; 123(5):1969-1978. PubMed ID: 32292098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An optimal protocol for measurement of corticospinal excitability, short intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation in the rectus femoris.
Brownstein CG; Ansdell P; Škarabot J; Howatson G; Goodall S; Thomas K
J Neurol Sci; 2018 Nov; 394():45-56. PubMed ID: 30216757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Priming the Motor Cortex With Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Affects the Acute Inhibitory Corticospinal Responses to Strength Training.
Frazer AK; Howatson G; Ahtiainen JP; Avela J; Rantalainen T; Kidgell DJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Feb; 33(2):307-317. PubMed ID: 30688872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of eccentric versus concentric contractions of the biceps brachii on intracortical inhibition and facilitation.
Latella C; Goodwill AM; Muthalib M; Hendy AM; Major B; Nosaka K; Teo WP
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Mar; 29(3):369-379. PubMed ID: 30403428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole-hand water flow stimulation increases motor cortical excitability: a study of transcranial magnetic stimulation and movement-related cortical potentials.
Sato D; Yamashiro K; Onishi H; Yasuhiro B; Shimoyama Y; Maruyama A
J Neurophysiol; 2015 Feb; 113(3):822-33. PubMed ID: 25376780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Task-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability and inhibition following strength training.
Siddique U; Rahman S; Frazer A; Leung M; Pearce AJ; Kidgell DJ
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2020 Jun; 52():102411. PubMed ID: 32244044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modulation of intracortical inhibition and excitation in agonist and antagonist muscles following acute strength training.
Mason J; Howatson G; Frazer AK; Pearce AJ; Jaberzadeh S; Avela J; Kidgell DJ
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2019 Oct; 119(10):2185-2199. PubMed ID: 31385029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The minimal number of TMS trials required for the reliable assessment of corticospinal excitability, short interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation.
Biabani M; Farrell M; Zoghi M; Egan G; Jaberzadeh S
Neurosci Lett; 2018 May; 674():94-100. PubMed ID: 29551425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motor cortex excitability is not differentially modulated following skill and strength training.
Leung M; Rantalainen T; Teo WP; Kidgell D
Neuroscience; 2015 Oct; 305():99-108. PubMed ID: 26259901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strength-trained adults demonstrate greater corticoreticular activation versus untrained controls.
Akalu Y; Tallent J; Frazer AK; Siddique U; Rostami M; Vallance P; Howatson G; Walker S; Kidgell DJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2024 May; 59(9):2336-2352. PubMed ID: 38419404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased cross-education of muscle strength and reduced corticospinal inhibition following eccentric strength training.
Kidgell DJ; Frazer AK; Daly RM; Rantalainen T; Ruotsalainen I; Ahtiainen J; Avela J; Howatson G
Neuroscience; 2015 Aug; 300():566-75. PubMed ID: 26037804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corticospinal and intracortical excitability is modulated in the knee extensors after acute strength training.
Alibazi RJ; Frazer AK; Pearce AJ; Tallent J; Avela J; Kidgell DJ
J Sports Sci; 2022 Mar; 40(5):561-570. PubMed ID: 34796778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex.
Peinemann A; Reimer B; Löer C; Quartarone A; Münchau A; Conrad B; Siebner HR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1519-26. PubMed ID: 15203053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strength training of one limb increases corticomotor excitability projecting to the contralateral homologous limb.
Kidgell DJ; Stokes MA; Pearce AJ
Motor Control; 2011 Apr; 15(2):247-66. PubMed ID: 21628728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of anodal tDCS duration threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: An investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms.
Hassanzahraee M; Nitsche MA; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(3):832-839. PubMed ID: 32289714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining the early corticospinal-motoneuronal responses to strength training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mason J; Frazer AK; Pearce AJ; Goodwill AM; Howatson G; Jaberzadeh S; Kidgell DJ
Rev Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 30(5):463-476. PubMed ID: 30864400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
