These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31785150)

  • 61. Estimation in meta-analyses of mean difference and standardized mean difference.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Stat Med; 2020 Jan; 39(2):171-191. PubMed ID: 31709582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Asymptotic Robustness Study of the Polychoric Correlation Estimation.
    Jin S; Yang-Wallentin F
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 27660261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Sparse Density Estimation on the Multinomial Manifold.
    Hong X; Gao J; Chen S; Zia T
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2015 Nov; 26(11):2972-7. PubMed ID: 25647665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Penalized partial likelihood regression for right-censored data with bootstrap selection of the penalty parameter.
    Huang J; Harrington D
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):781-91. PubMed ID: 12495132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Sparse Estimation Strategies in Linear Mixed Effect Models for High-Dimensional Data Application.
    Opoku EA; Ahmed SE; Nathoo FS
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Oct; 23(10):. PubMed ID: 34682072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Analysis of hypoglycemic events using negative binomial models.
    Luo J; Qu Y
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 23776062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
    Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A comparison study on modeling of clustered and overdispersed count data for multiple comparisons.
    Kruppa J; Hothorn L
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(16):3220-3232. PubMed ID: 35707260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Confidence intervals for multinomial logistic regression in sparse data.
    Bull SB; Lewinger JP; Lee SS
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):903-18. PubMed ID: 16489602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A comparison of methods for estimating the benchmark dose based on overdispersed data from developmental toxicity studies.
    Fung KY; Marro L; Krewski D
    Risk Anal; 1998 Jun; 18(3):329-42. PubMed ID: 9664728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A semiparametric model for the analysis of recurrent-event panel data.
    Balshaw RF; Dean CB
    Biometrics; 2002 Jun; 58(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 12071405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Estimation in regression models for longitudinal binary data with outcome-dependent follow-up.
    Fitzmaurice GM; Lipsitz SR; Ibrahim JG; Gelber R; Lipshultz S
    Biostatistics; 2006 Jul; 7(3):469-85. PubMed ID: 16428260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Adjusting for overdispersion in piecewise exponential regression models to estimate excess mortality rate in population-based research.
    Luque-Fernandez MA; Belot A; Quaresma M; Maringe C; Coleman MP; Rachet B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):129. PubMed ID: 27716079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.
    Pang M; Schuster T; Filion KB; Schnitzer ME; Eberg M; Platt RW
    Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27889705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Extending the Lincoln-Petersen estimator for multiple identifications in one source.
    Köse T; Orman M; Ikiz F; Baksh MF; Gallagher J; Böhning D
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4237-49. PubMed ID: 24833434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The mixed model for the analysis of a repeated-measurement multivariate count data.
    Martin I; Uh HW; Supali T; Mitreva M; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(12):2248-2268. PubMed ID: 30761571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Population size and stopover duration estimation using mark-resight data and Bayesian analysis of a superpopulation model.
    Lyons JE; Kendall WL; Royle JA; Converse SJ; Andres BA; Buchanan JB
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):262-71. PubMed ID: 26348116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Estimation of a change point in a hazard function based on censored data.
    Gijbels I; Gürler U
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2003 Dec; 9(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 15000412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A conditional predictive p-value to compare a multinomial with an overdispersed multinomial in the analysis of T-cell populations.
    Pei Q; Zuleger CL; Macklin MD; Albertini MR; Newton MA
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):129-39. PubMed ID: 24096387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.