BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31785577)

  • 21. Regular rhythmic and audio-visual stimulations enhance procedural learning of a perceptual-motor sequence in healthy adults: A pilot study.
    Lagarrigue Y; Cappe C; Tallet J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259081. PubMed ID: 34780497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Top-down attention modulates the direction and magnitude of sensory dominance.
    Fang Y; Li Y; Xu X; Tao H; Chen Q
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Mar; 238(3):587-600. PubMed ID: 31996936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sequence in a sequence: Learning of auditory but not visual patterns within a multimodal sequence.
    Kemény F; Lukács Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Aug; 199():102905. PubMed ID: 31404742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implicit auditory modulation on the temporal characteristics of perceptual alternation in visual competition.
    Takahashi K; Watanabe K
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):11.1-13. PubMed ID: 20465331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional resources contribute to the perceptual learning of talker idiosyncrasies in audiovisual speech.
    Jesse A; Kaplan E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1006-1019. PubMed ID: 30684204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual and auditory influence on perceptual stability in visual competition.
    Takahashi K; Watanabe K
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(6):545-64. PubMed ID: 21902880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 20565224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Repetition blindness and the Colavita effect.
    Ngo MK; Sinnett S; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Aug; 480(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 20561565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Object-based auditory and visual attention.
    Shinn-Cunningham BG
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 May; 12(5):182-6. PubMed ID: 18396091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Effect of modality specific interference on working memory in recalling aversive auditory and visual memories
    Matthijssen SJMA; van Schie K; van den Hout MA
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Sep; 33(6):1169-1180. PubMed ID: 30465479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multisensory executive functioning.
    Hunt AR; Kingstone A
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):325-7. PubMed ID: 15177806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual-auditory interaction in saccadic reaction time: effects of auditory masker level.
    Steenken R; Colonius H; Diederich A; Rach S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():150-6. PubMed ID: 17900544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of stimulus modality and frequency of stimulus presentation on cross-modal distraction.
    Mayer AR; Franco AR; Canive J; Harrington DL
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 May; 19(5):993-1007. PubMed ID: 18787235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Event-related potentials to auditory and visual selective attention in schizophrenia.
    Wood SM; Potts GF; Hall JF; Ulanday JB; Netsiri C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Apr; 60(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 16009438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of visual information on auditory lateralization.
    Saetrevik B
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 51(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 20497397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.