These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31785832)

  • 1. Comparison of various 3D printed and milled PAEK materials: Effect of printing direction and artificial aging on Martens parameters.
    Prechtel A; Reymus M; Edelhoff D; Hickel R; Stawarczyk B
    Dent Mater; 2020 Feb; 36(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31785832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture load of 3D printed PEEK inlays compared with milled ones, direct resin composite fillings, and sound teeth.
    Prechtel A; Stawarczyk B; Hickel R; Edelhoff D; Reymus M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Oct; 24(10):3457-3466. PubMed ID: 31989370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro study on the influence of postpolymerization and aging on the Martens parameters of 3D-printed occlusal devices.
    Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):817-823. PubMed ID: 32444206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of Different Postpolymerization Strategies and Artificial Aging on Hardness of 3D-Printed Resin Materials: An In Vitro Study.
    Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(6):634-640. PubMed ID: 33284905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of printing orientation and artificial ageing on martens hardness and indentation modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials.
    Mudhaffer S; Althagafi R; Haider J; Satterthwaite J; Silikas N
    Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1003-1014. PubMed ID: 38735775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture load of 3D-printed fixed dental prostheses compared with milled and conventionally fabricated ones: the impact of resin material, build direction, post-curing, and artificial aging-an in vitro study.
    Reymus M; Fabritius R; Keßler A; Hickel R; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):701-710. PubMed ID: 31127429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D printing of dental restorations: Mechanical properties of thermoplastic polymer materials.
    Schönhoff LM; Mayinger F; Eichberger M; Reznikova E; Stawarczyk B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jul; 119():104544. PubMed ID: 33901966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical and physical properties of splint materials for oral appliances produced by additive, subtractive and conventional manufacturing.
    Maleki T; Meinen J; Coldea A; Reymus M; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
    Dent Mater; 2024 Aug; 40(8):1171-1183. PubMed ID: 38851965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different PEEK qualities irradiated with light of different wavelengths: Impact on Martens hardness.
    Lümkemann N; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
    Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):968-975. PubMed ID: 28662860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of artificial aging on Martens hardness and indentation modulus of different dental CAD/CAM restorative materials.
    Hampe R; Lümkemann N; Sener B; Stawarczyk B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Oct; 86():191-198. PubMed ID: 29986293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modern CAD/CAM silicate ceramics, their translucency level and impact of hydrothermal aging on translucency, Martens hardness, biaxial flexural strength and their reliability.
    Stawarczyk B; Mandl A; Liebermann A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jun; 118():104456. PubMed ID: 33740686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of storage and toothbrush simulation on Martens hardness of CAD/CAM, hand-cast, thermoforming, and 3D-printed splint materials.
    Rosentritt M; Hickl V; Rauch A; Schmidt M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7859-7869. PubMed ID: 37957307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexural strength, fracture toughness, three-body wear, and Martens parameters of pressable lithium-X-silicate ceramics.
    Stawarczyk B; Dinse L; Eichberger M; Jungbauer R; Liebermann A
    Dent Mater; 2020 Mar; 36(3):420-430. PubMed ID: 32007315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of the heating/quenching process on the mechanical, optical and thermodynamic properties of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) films.
    Bodden L; Lümkemann N; Köhler V; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
    Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 29029849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the mechanical properties of pressed, milled, and 3D-printed resins for occlusal devices.
    Berli C; Thieringer FM; Sharma N; Müller JA; Dedem P; Fischer J; Rohr N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):780-786. PubMed ID: 31955837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of artificial aging by thermocycling on edge chipping resistance and Martens hardness of different dental CAD-CAM restorative materials.
    Hampe R; Theelke B; Lümkemann N; Stawarczyk B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):326-333. PubMed ID: 32115219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of thermocycling on surface topography and fracture toughness of milled and additively manufactured denture base materials: an in-vitro study.
    Abdul-Monem MM; Hanno KI
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):267. PubMed ID: 38395828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of storage medium and aging duration on mechanical properties of self-adhesive resin-based cements.
    Liebermann A; Ilie N; Roos M; Stawarczyk B
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2017 Jul; 15(3):e206-e214. PubMed ID: 28574094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of fracture strength, surface hardness, and color stain of conventionally fabricated, 3D printed, and CAD-CAM milled interim prosthodontic materials after thermocycling.
    Yıldırım M; Aykent F; Özdoğan MS
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 16(2):115-125. PubMed ID: 38694194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporary 3D printed fixed dental prosthesis materials: Impact of post printing cleaning methods on degree of conversion as well as surface and mechanical properties.
    Mayer J; Reymus M; Wiedenmann F; Edelhoff D; Hickel R; Stawarczyk B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(6):784–795. PubMed ID: 33616559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.