328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31786289)
1. Mechanical Versus Biologic Prostheses for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 70.
Kytö V; Sipilä J; Ahtela E; Rautava P; Gunn J
Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Jul; 110(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 31786289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term Outcomes of Mechanical Vs Biologic Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Patients Older Than 70 Years.
Kytö V; Myllykangas ME; Sipilä J; Niiranen TJ; Rautava P; Gunn J
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Nov; 108(5):1354-1360. PubMed ID: 31082357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with infective endocarditis.
Kytö V; Ahtela E; Sipilä J; Rautava P; Gunn J
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2019 Sep; 29(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 31121026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valve prostheses in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database.
Brennan JM; Edwards FH; Zhao Y; O'Brien S; Booth ME; Dokholyan RS; Douglas PS; Peterson ED;
Circulation; 2013 Apr; 127(16):1647-55. PubMed ID: 23538379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biological or mechanical prostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50-65 years: the ANDALVALVE study.
Rodríguez-Caulo EA; Macías D; Adsuar A; Ferreiro A; Arias-Dachary J; Parody G; Fernández F; Daroca T; Rodríguez-Mora F; Garrido JM; Muñoz-Carvajal I; Barquero JM; Valderrama JF; Melero JM
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Jun; 55(6):1160-1167. PubMed ID: 30608571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.
Schnittman SR; Adams DH; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):539-547.e9. PubMed ID: 29110948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prosthesis Selection for Aortic Valve Replacement With Concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Hu X; Jiang W; Li H; Zhou T; Dong N; Wang Y
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Jan; 113(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 33667456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement for infective endocarditis in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Hu X; Jiang W; Xie M; Guo R; Yim WY; Dong N; Wang Y
Clin Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 43(10):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 32497339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival and Long-Term Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 55 to 65 Years.
Alex S; Hiebert B; Arora R; Menkis A; Shah P
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):313-321. PubMed ID: 28511244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical aortic valve replacement and infective endocarditis.
Malmberg M; Ahtela E; Sipilä JOT; Gunn J; Rautava P; Kytö V
Eur J Clin Invest; 2021 Jun; 51(6):e13476. PubMed ID: 33326602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Infective endocarditis after surgical aortic or mitral valve replacement: A nationwide population-based study.
Lee HA; Wu VC; Chan YS; Cheng YT; Lee JK; Chu PH; Chen SW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Oct; 166(4):1056-1068.e7. PubMed ID: 35086668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bioprosthetic Versus Mechanical Valve Replacement for Infective Endocarditis: Focus on Recurrence Rates.
Toyoda N; Itagaki S; Tannous H; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Jul; 106(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 29452115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Nationwide Propensity-matched Study.
Myllykangas ME; Aittokallio J; Gunn J; Sipilä J; Rautava P; Kytö V
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2020 Apr; 34(4):932-939. PubMed ID: 31732381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
Brown ML; Schaff HV; Lahr BD; Mullany CJ; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; McGregor CG; Orszulak TA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survival and outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Chikwe J; Chiang YP; Egorova NN; Itagaki S; Adams DH
JAMA; 2015 Apr; 313(14):1435-42. PubMed ID: 25871669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
