328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31786289)
21. Aortic valve replacement with mechanical and biologic prosthesis in middle-aged patients.
Carrier M; Pellerin M; Perrault LP; Pagé P; Hébert Y; Cartier R; Dyrda I; Pelletier LC
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 May; 71(5 Suppl):S253-6. PubMed ID: 11388198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves.
Florath I; Albert A; Rosendahl U; Alexander T; Ennker IC; Ennker J
Heart; 2005 Aug; 91(8):1023-9. PubMed ID: 16020589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reoperative Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Replacement for Degenerated Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.
Ejiofor JI; Yammine M; Harloff MT; McGurk S; Muehlschlegel JD; Shekar PS; Cohn LH; Shah P; Kaneko T
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Nov; 102(5):1452-1458. PubMed ID: 27526654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Similar long-term survival after isolated bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement: A propensity-matched analysis.
Attia T; Yang Y; Svensson LG; Toth AJ; Rajeswaran J; Blackstone EH; Johnston DR;
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Nov; 164(5):1444-1455.e4. PubMed ID: 33892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Homograft Versus Conventional Prosthesis for Surgical Management of Aortic Valve Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Yanagawa B; Mazine A; Tam DY; Jüni P; Bhatt DL; Spindel S; Puskas JD; Verma S; Friedrich JO
Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(3):163-170. PubMed ID: 29912740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Are homografts superior to conventional prosthetic valves in the setting of infective endocarditis involving the aortic valve?
Kim JB; Ejiofor JI; Yammine M; Camuso JM; Walsh CW; Ando M; Melnitchouk SI; Rawn JD; Leacche M; MacGillivray TE; Cohn LH; Byrne JG; Sundt TM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 May; 151(5):1239-46, 1248.e1-2. PubMed ID: 26936004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mechanical or Biologic Prostheses for Aortic-Valve and Mitral-Valve Replacement.
Goldstone AB; Chiu P; Baiocchi M; Lingala B; Patrick WL; Fischbein MP; Woo YJ
N Engl J Med; 2017 Nov; 377(19):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 29117490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Late Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement with Bioprosthesis and Mechanical Prosthesis.
Bruscky LVR; Gun C; Ramos AIO; Morais AL
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2021 Jul; 117(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 34320064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Having Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Versus Without Simultaneous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Malmberg M; Gunn J; Sipilä J; Pikkarainen E; Rautava P; Kytö V
Am J Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 125(6):964-969. PubMed ID: 31948663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
Davis EA; Greene PS; Cameron DE; Gott VI; Laschinger JC; Stuart RS; Sussman MS; Watkins L; Baumgartner WA
Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can prosthesis type influence the recurrence of infective endocarditis after surgery for native valve endocarditis? A propensity weighted comparison.
Rubino AS; Della Ratta EE; Galbiati D; Ashurov R; Galgano VL; Montella AP; De Feo M; Della Corte A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Dec; 60(6):1388-1394. PubMed ID: 34008022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preferability of bioprostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement--a comparative study between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves.
Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K
Jpn Circ J; 1990 Feb; 54(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 2355449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Aortic valve replacement with mechanical vs. biological prostheses in patients aged 50-69 years.
Glaser N; Jackson V; Holzmann MJ; Franco-Cereceda A; Sartipy U
Eur Heart J; 2016 Sep; 37(34):2658-67. PubMed ID: 26559386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Thirty-day mortality and long-term survival following surgery for prosthetic endocarditis: a study from the UK heart valve registry.
Edwards MB; Ratnatunga CP; Dore CJ; Taylor KM
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Aug; 14(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 9755001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Redo aortic root replacement: experience with 31 patients.
Raanani E; David TE; Dellgren G; Armstrong S; Ivanov J; Feindel CM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 May; 71(5):1460-3. PubMed ID: 11383783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Late results of double-valve replacement with biologic or mechanical prostheses.
Caus T; Rouvière P; Collart F; Mouly-Bandini A; Montiès JR; Mesana T
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 May; 71(5 Suppl):S261-4. PubMed ID: 11388200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Valve type and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in older patients.
Schelbert EB; Vaughan-Sarrazin MS; Welke KF; Rosenthal GE
Heart; 2008 Sep; 94(9):1181-8. PubMed ID: 18070945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
