These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31786330)

  • 1. Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Sessile Serrated Polyps 10 mm or Larger: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Aziz M; Patel HK; Sidhu N; Duvvuri A; Dasari C; Kennedy KF; Ashwath A; Spadaccini M; Desai M; Jegadeesan R; Sathyamurthy A; Vennalaganti P; Kohli D; Hassan C; Pellise M; Repici A; Sharma P; Bourke MJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Oct; 18(11):2448-2455.e3. PubMed ID: 31786330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection is equally effective for sessile serrated polyps and conventional adenomas.
    Agarwal A; Garimall S; Scott FI; Ahmad NA; Kochman ML; Ginsberg GG; Chandrasekhara V
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1871-1878. PubMed ID: 28940106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cold snare endoscopic resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and pooled-analysis.
    Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Spadaccini M; Aziz M; Maselli R; Hassan S; Fuccio L; Duvvuri A; Frazzoni L; Desai M; Fugazza A; Jegadeesan R; Colombo M; Dasari CS; Hassan C; Sharma P; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 May; 89(5):929-936.e3. PubMed ID: 30639542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cold Versus Hot Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Sessile Serrated Colorectal Polyps ≥10 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Malik TF; Mohan BP; Deliwala S; Kassab LL; Chandan S; Sharma NR; Adler DG
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38019045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cold EMR vs. Hot EMR for the removal of sessile serrated polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ding C; Yang JF; Wang X; Zhou YF; Khizar H; Jin Z; Zhang XF
    BMC Surg; 2024 Mar; 24(1):93. PubMed ID: 38509508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for sessile serrated polyps ≥ 10 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li DF; Van Overbeke L; Ohata K; Wang LS; Yao J
    Dig Liver Dis; 2022 Nov; 54(11):1486-1493. PubMed ID: 35168877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cold EMR of large sessile serrated polyps at colonoscopy (with video).
    Tutticci NJ; Hewett DG
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):837-842. PubMed ID: 29133196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.
    Buchner AM; Guarner-Argente C; Ginsberg GG
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 22657404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting
    Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.
    Mangira D; Raftopoulos S; Vogrin S; Hartley I; Mack A; Gazelakis K; Nalankilli K; Trinh A; Metz AJ; Appleyard M; Grimpen F; Elliott T; Brown G; Moss A
    Endoscopy; 2023 Jul; 55(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 36750222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.
    Li D; Wang W; Xie J; Liu G; Wang R; Jiang C; Ye Z; Xu B; He X; Hong D
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis.
    Chandan S; Khan SR; Kumar A; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Kassab LL; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Kochhar GS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Sep; 94(3):471-482.e9. PubMed ID: 33385463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hot snare polypectomy with or without saline solution/epinephrine lift for the complete resection of small colorectal polyps.
    Kim HS; Jung HY; Park HJ; Kim HM; Seong JH; Kang YS; Cho MY; Yu MH; Kang DR
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1539-1547. PubMed ID: 29409923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection for colon polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Abdallah M; Ahmed K; Abbas D; Mohamed MFH; Suryawanshi G; McDonald N; Wilson N; Umar S; Shaukat A; Bilal M
    Endoscopy; 2023 Dec; 55(12):1083-1094. PubMed ID: 37451284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Yuan X; Gao H; Liu C; Cui H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Lu H; Xu L
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2021; 27(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 34643573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy with submucosal injection for the removal of polyps less than 20 mm in size: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liang Z; Wei Y; Zhang S; Li P
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Nov; 38(11):1892-1899. PubMed ID: 37608577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial.
    Kemper G; Gerges C; Schoon EJ; Schreuder RM; Schrauwen RRW; Epping LSM; Beyna T; Drenth JPH; Gündug U; Siersema PD; van Geenen EJM;
    Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):132. PubMed ID: 38368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Rotermund C; Djinbachian R; Taghiakbari M; Enderle MD; Eickhoff A; von Renteln D
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Aug; 28(29):4007-4018. PubMed ID: 36157546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Higher rate of en bloc resection with underwater than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: A meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Gkolfakis P; Triantafyllou K; Fuccio L; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Probst A; Hassan C; Messmann H
    Dig Liver Dis; 2021 Aug; 53(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 34059445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li DF; Lai MG; Yang MF; Zou ZY; Xu J; Peng RM; Xiong F; Wei C; Zhang DG; Xu ZL; Wang LS; Yao J
    Endoscopy; 2021 Jun; 53(6):636-646. PubMed ID: 32767283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.