These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3178646)
21. Hospitals work through superfund citations. Hudson T Hospitals; 1993 Jan; 67(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 8417994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Regulatory importance of pesticide degradation products from an environmental fate perspective. Creeger SM J Toxicol Clin Toxicol; 1982 Aug; 19(6-7):759-72. PubMed ID: 7161851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Chromium and regulation: bits and pieces. Beall JR Sci Total Environ; 1989 Oct; 86(1-2):187-90. PubMed ID: 2602934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. How sick a patient? Report of a workshop on cancer risk assessment. Gori GB; Flamm WG Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1991 Dec; 14(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 1685256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A proactive approach to toxic chemicals: moving green chemistry beyond alternatives in the "Safe Chemicals Act of 2010". Matus KJ; Zimmerman JB; Beach E Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Aug; 44(16):6022-3. PubMed ID: 20704195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program. Charnley S; Engelbert B J Environ Manage; 2005 Nov; 77(3):165-82. PubMed ID: 16112794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An agency in crisis. Schnoor JL Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jun; 42(11):3907. PubMed ID: 18589940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Regulating chemicals: law, science, and the unbearable burdens of regulation. Silbergeld EK; Mandrioli D; Cranor CF Annu Rev Public Health; 2015 Mar; 36():175-91. PubMed ID: 25785889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Doubts linger over America's top herbicide. Dalton R Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):256. PubMed ID: 12447403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Environmental pollution in the area of Gela]. Musmeci L; Carere M; Fallenti F Epidemiol Prev; 2009; 33(3 Suppl 1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19776464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The unsteady state and inertia of chemical regulation under the US Toxic Substances Control Act. Krimsky S PLoS Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(12):e2002404. PubMed ID: 29252997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Weinberg proposal. Thacker PD Environ Sci Technol; 2006 May; 40(9):2868-9. PubMed ID: 16719083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The risk where you live. Schmidt CW Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Jun; 111(7):A404-7. PubMed ID: 12782515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. US environmental regulations and policies--their impact on the commercial development of bioremediation. Day SM Trends Biotechnol; 1993 Aug; 11(8):324-8. PubMed ID: 7764178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. U.S. EPA to revisit asbestos toxicity. Renner R Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):1808-9. PubMed ID: 17410766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of science in environmental health policy: some examples. Nelson N Environ Mutagen; 1984; 6(3):355-69. PubMed ID: 6734544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment, communication, and management of environmental risks. Ruckelshaus WD Basic Life Sci; 1988; 45():333-40. PubMed ID: 3178642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]