395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31786599)
1. Mandibular propulsion appliance for adults with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
González Espinosa D; Santos M; Mendes SMDA; Normando D
Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 31786599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis.
Yang X; Zhu Y; Long H; Zhou Y; Jian F; Ye N; Gao M; Lai W
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 26306822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Angle class II correction: stepwise mandibular advancement or bite jumping? : A systematic review and meta-analysis of skeletal, dental and condylar effects.
Knösel M; Espinoza-Espinoza GE; Sandoval-Vidal P; Zaror C
J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Jul; 81(4):286-300. PubMed ID: 32435862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes in patients with a Class II relationship treated with clear aligner mandibular advancement and Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment.
Hosseini HR; Ngan P; Tai SK; Andrews LJ; Xiang J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Feb; 165(2):205-219. PubMed ID: 37831020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
Baysal A; Uysal T
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Twin Block appliance and Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II malocclusion among children: a meta-analysis.
Xu F; Fang Y; Sui X; Yao Y
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):278. PubMed ID: 38409017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Class II malocclusion treatment with the Herbst appliance in patients after the growth peak.
Alvares JC; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; de Freitas KM; Angheben CZ
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(5):38-45. PubMed ID: 24352386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One phase or two phase orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion ?
Veitz-Keenan A; Liu N
Evid Based Dent; 2019 Sep; 20(3):72-73. PubMed ID: 31562403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Herbst appliance combined with a completely customized lingual appliance: A retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
Mujagic M; Pandis N; Fleming PS; Katsaros C
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):732-738. PubMed ID: 32839142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stepwise versus single-step mandibular advancement with functional appliance in treating class II patients : A meta-analysis.
Chen Z; Chen Q; Fan X; Li Y; Mo S
J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Sep; 81(5):311-327. PubMed ID: 32415333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bock NC; von Bremen J; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 25820407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Harrison JE; Worthington HV; O'Brien KD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; (11):CD003452. PubMed ID: 24226169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One phase or two phases orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion?
Veitz-Keenan A; Liu N
Evid Based Dent; 2019 Jun; 20(2):56-57. PubMed ID: 31253968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Dentaoalveolar changes in young adult patients with class II/1 malocclusion treated with the herbst appliance and an activator].
Nedeljković N; Sćepan I; Glisić B; Marković E
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Feb; 67(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 20337101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal and dental effects of Herbst appliance anchored with temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Al-Dboush R; Soltan R; Rao J; El-Bialy T
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 34145968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
