248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31786702)
1. MRI-targeted biopsy for detecting prostate cancer: have the guidelines changed our practices and our prostate cancer detection rate?
Baboudjian M; Bandelier Q; Gondran-Tellier B; Abdallah R; Michel F; Sichez PC; Di-Crocco E; Akiki A; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Andre M; Daniel L; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R
Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Apr; 52(4):611-618. PubMed ID: 31786702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interaction of patient age and high-grade prostate cancer on targeted biopsies of MRI suspicious lesions.
Pak JS; Huang R; Huang WC; Lepor H; Wysock JS; Taneja SS
BJU Int; 2024 Jul; 134(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 38533536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Biopsy Alone for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Elwenspoek MMC; Sheppard AL; McInnes MDF; Merriel SWD; Rowe EWJ; Bryant RJ; Donovan JL; Whiting P
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198427. PubMed ID: 31390032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate?
Exterkate L; Wegelin O; Barentsz JO; van der Leest MG; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; van Melick HHE; Somford DM
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 3(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 31239236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimizing Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted and Systematic Biopsy Strategies: Sparing the Multiparametric MRI-Negative Transitional Zone in Presence of Exclusively Peripheral Multiparametric MRI-Suspect Lesions.
Kachanov M; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Roberts MJ; Sauer M; Beyersdorff D; Boiko S; Maurer T; Steuber T; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):333-340. PubMed ID: 34555925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonsuspicious prebiopsy multiparametric MRI: is prostate biopsy still necessary?
Anastay V; Gondran-Tellier B; McManus R; Delonca R; Akiki A; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Andre M; Daniel L; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R; Baboudjian M
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4160-4165. PubMed ID: 32902661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.
Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men.
Knaapila J; Autio V; Jambor I; Ettala O; Verho J; Kiviniemi A; Taimen P; Perez IM; Aronen HJ; Syvänen KT; Boström PJ
Scand J Urol; 2020 Feb; 54(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 31914846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?
Polanec SH; Bickel H; Wengert GJ; Arnoldner M; Clauser P; Susani M; Shariat SF; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e1-157.e7. PubMed ID: 31690449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic versus Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy among Men with Visible Lesions.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Fang AM; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Rais-Bahrami S; Gupta GN
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):108-117. PubMed ID: 34428091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series.
Barletta F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Brembilla G; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Scuderi S; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):103.e17-103.e24. PubMed ID: 34688534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Micro-US and Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-Naive Men.
Ghai S; Perlis N; Atallah C; Jokhu S; Corr K; Lajkosz K; Incze PF; Zlotta AR; Jain U; Fleming H; Finelli A; van der Kwast TH; Haider MA
Radiology; 2022 Nov; 305(2):390-398. PubMed ID: 35852425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter Randomized Trial Assessing MRI and Image-guided Biopsy for Suspected Prostate Cancer: The MULTIPROS Study.
Wei C; Szewczyk-Bieda M; Bates AS; Donnan PT; Rauchhaus P; Gandy S; Ragupathy SKA; Singh P; Coll K; Serhan J; Wilson J; Nabi G
Radiology; 2023 Jul; 308(1):e221428. PubMed ID: 37489992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies vs. systematic prostate biopsies in biopsy-naïve, previous negative biopsy patients and men undergoing active surveillance.
Borghesi M; Bianchi L; Barbaresi U; Vagnoni V; Corcioni B; Gaudiano C; Fiorentino M; Giunchi F; Chessa F; Garofalo M; Bertaccini A; Angelini S; Ercolino A; Casablanca C; Droghetti M; Golfieri R; Schiavina R
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Jun; 73(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 33769008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study.
Rouvière O; Puech P; Renard-Penna R; Claudon M; Roy C; Mège-Lechevallier F; Decaussin-Petrucci M; Dubreuil-Chambardel M; Magaud L; Remontet L; Ruffion A; Colombel M; Crouzet S; Schott AM; Lemaitre L; Rabilloud M; Grenier N;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):100-109. PubMed ID: 30470502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer.
Wagaskar VG; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Young J; Lantz A; Parekh S; Falagario UG; Li L; Lewis S; Haines K; Punnen S; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2021 Aug; 4(4):e1357. PubMed ID: 33661541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing target prostate biopsy alone approach vs. target plus standard in naïve patients with positive mpMRI.
Porpiglia F; Checcucci E; DE Cillis S; Piramide F; Amparore D; Piana A; Volpi G; Granato S; Zamengo D; Stura I; Alladio E; Migliaretti G; DE Luca S; Bollito E; Gned D; DI Dio M; Autorino R; Manfredi M; Fiori C
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2023 Feb; 75(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 36626117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
