427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31786842)
1. Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer.
Ding Y; Li Z; Gao H; Cao Y; Jin W
J BUON; 2019; 24(5):1817-1823. PubMed ID: 31786842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with sigmoid colon/high rectal cancer.
He Q; Huang J; Niu L; Zhai C
J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 127(7):1160-1166. PubMed ID: 36913188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has more advantages comparing with laparoscopic-assisted resection for selected patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.
Xingmao Z; Haitao Z; Jianwei L; Huirong H; Junjie H; Zhixiang Z
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1119-24. PubMed ID: 24986143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled study with 3-year follow-up results].
Chen ZZ; Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Wang ZF; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 25(7):604-611. PubMed ID: 35844123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of short-term outcomes of transrectal specimen extraction during laparoscopic sigmoid radical resection versus conventional laparoscopically assisted procedure].
Xing J; Zhang C; Yang X; Wang H; Wang H; Yu E; Fu C
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 20(6):665-670. PubMed ID: 28643312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transrectal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) With Oncological Safety: A Prospective and Randomized Trial.
Zhou ZQ; Wang K; Du T; Gao W; Zhu Z; Jiang Q; Ji F; Fu CG
J Surg Res; 2020 Oct; 254():16-22. PubMed ID: 32402832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A modified technique of transanal specimen extraction in the laparoscopic anterior rectal resection for upper rectal or lower sigmoid colon cancer: a retrospective study.
Yu S; Ji Y; Luo T; Xu P; Zhen Z; Deng J
BMC Surg; 2021 Feb; 21(1):82. PubMed ID: 33579251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Really Safe in Radical Surgery for Colorectal Cancer?
Liu G; Shi L; Wu Z
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():837902. PubMed ID: 35265042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Efficacy analysis of suprapubic single-incision laparoscopy in the treatment of rectosigmoid cancer].
Liu R; Wang Y; Xiong W; Zhang Z; Deng H; Li G
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 27353098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction.
Hisada M; Katsumata K; Ishizaki T; Enomoto M; Matsudo T; Kasuya K; Tsuchida A
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 20(44):16707-13. PubMed ID: 25469041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method].
Xu S; Zhang H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 24(8):698-703. PubMed ID: 34412187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction].
Gao GM; Liu DN; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1124-1130. PubMed ID: 31874527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-Port with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction versus Conventional Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal-Sigmoid Cancer: A Matched Pair Analysis.
Zhou H; Wang A; Lu H; Wu J; Ying J; Hu Z; Ruan C
J Invest Surg; 2022 Apr; 35(4):788-792. PubMed ID: 34542379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE-LAR) versus abdominal incision specimen extraction (AISE-LAR) for sigmoid or rectal tumors.
He J; Yao HB; Wang CJ; Yang QY; Qiu JM; Chen JM; Shen Z; Yang GG
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 18(1):215. PubMed ID: 32814583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A retrospective controlled clinical study of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer].
Li GX; Li JM; Wang YN; Deng HJ; Mou TY; Liu H
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):515-520. PubMed ID: 28655080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic NOSE for sigmoid and rectal cancer.
Xu S; Liu K; Chen X; Yao H
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jan; 36(1):222-235. PubMed ID: 33475847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of trans-anal natural orifice specimen extraction combined with laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid and rectal carcinoma: An observational study.
Ng HI; Sun WQ; Zhao XM; Jin L; Shen XX; Zhang ZT; Wang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(38):e12347. PubMed ID: 30235691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction colectomy using a Cai tube for left-sided colon cancer: a prospective randomized trial.
Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SB; Yan F; Wang ZF; Liu GY; Cai JC
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jan; 37(1):749-758. PubMed ID: 35906459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review of single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer.
Liu X; Li JB; Shi G; Guo R; Zhang R
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 16(1):220. PubMed ID: 30414613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction for carcinoma of sigmoid colon and rectum: a feasible and innovative technique.
Zhang X; Zhou H; Hou H; Hu J; Wang H; Zhou Z
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 48(7):e57-61. PubMed ID: 24440933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
