169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31787097)
1. Statistical modeling of STR capillary electrophoresis signal.
Karkar S; Alfonse LE; Grgicak CM; Lun DS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 16):584. PubMed ID: 31787097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. NOCIt: a computational method to infer the number of contributors to DNA samples analyzed by STR genotyping.
Swaminathan H; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():172-180. PubMed ID: 25625964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of a next generation sequencing SNP assay on degraded DNA.
Gettings KB; Kiesler KM; Vallone PM
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():1-9. PubMed ID: 26036183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories.
Jäger AC; Alvarez ML; Davis CP; Guzmán E; Han Y; Way L; Walichiewicz P; Silva D; Pham N; Caves G; Bruand J; Schlesinger F; Pond SJK; Varlaro J; Stephens KM; Holt CL
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():52-70. PubMed ID: 28171784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Capillary electrophoresis of miniSTR markers to genotype highly degraded DNA samples.
Coble MD
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 830():31-42. PubMed ID: 22139651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring STR signal in the single- and multicopy number regimes: Deductions from an in silico model of the entire DNA laboratory process.
Duffy KR; Gurram N; Peters KC; Wellner G; Grgicak CM
Electrophoresis; 2017 Mar; 38(6):855-868. PubMed ID: 27981603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the LUS in sequence allele designations to facilitate probabilistic genotyping of NGS-based STR typing results.
Just RS; Irwin JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():197-205. PubMed ID: 29525576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Filipino DNA variation at 12 X-chromosome short tandem repeat markers.
Salvador JM; Apaga DLT; Delfin FC; Calacal GC; Dennis SE; De Ungria MCA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():e8-e12. PubMed ID: 29909139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High sensitivity multiplex short tandem repeat loci analyses with massively parallel sequencing.
Zeng X; King JL; Stoljarova M; Warshauer DH; LaRue BL; Sajantila A; Patel J; Storts DR; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():38-47. PubMed ID: 25528025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical model for degraded DNA samples and adjusted probabilities for allelic drop-out.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 21458395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance and concordance of the ForenSeq™ system for autosomal and Y chromosome short tandem repeat sequencing of reference-type specimens.
Just RS; Moreno LI; Smerick JB; Irwin JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():1-9. PubMed ID: 28126691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of STR typing by capillary electrophoresis.
Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Brown AL; Budowle B
J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):661-76. PubMed ID: 11373005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhanced low-template DNA analysis conditions and investigation of allele dropout patterns.
Hedell R; Dufva C; Ansell R; Mostad P; Hedman J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():61-75. PubMed ID: 25282604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated analysis of sequence polymorphism in STR alleles by PCR and direct electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
Planz JV; Sannes-Lowery KA; Duncan DD; Manalili S; Budowle B; Chakraborty R; Hofstadler SA; Hall TA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Sep; 6(5):594-606. PubMed ID: 22405515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A large-scale dataset of single and mixed-source short tandem repeat profiles to inform human identification strategies: PROVEDIt.
Alfonse LE; Garrett AD; Lun DS; Duffy KR; Grgicak CM
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():62-70. PubMed ID: 29091906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Higher capillary electrophoresis injection settings as an efficient approach to increase the sensitivity of STR typing.
Westen AA; Nagel JH; Benschop CC; Weiler NE; de Jong BJ; Sijen T
J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):591-8. PubMed ID: 19432738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct comparison of post-28-cycle PCR purification and modified capillary electrophoresis methods with the 34-cycle "low copy number" (LCN) method for analysis of trace forensic DNA samples.
Forster L; Thomson J; Kutranov S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 19083842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
