These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31787664)

  • 1. Differences in Flow-Gradient Patterns Between Severe Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis and Severe Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis　- Mechanistic Insight From Multimodal Imaging.
    Kim D; Shim CY; Kim YJ; Nam K; Hong GR; Lee SH; Lee S; Ha JW
    Circ J; 2019 Dec; 84(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 31787664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome of Patients with Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Underwent Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Fan XL; Zhang J; Wang C; Chong H; Zhang G; Xue Q; Tang Y; Han L
    Heart Surg Forum; 2017 Jul; 20(4):E124-E128. PubMed ID: 28846524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vector Flow Imaging of the Ascending Aorta in Patients with Tricuspid and Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis Treated with Biological and Mechanical Implants.
    Hansen KL; Møller-Sørensen H; Kjaergaard J; Jensen JA; Nielsen MB
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 46(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 31677849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: new insights from weights of operatively excised aortic valves.
    Clavel MA; Côté N; Mathieu P; Dumesnil JG; Audet A; Pépin A; Couture C; Fournier D; Trahan S; Pagé S; Pibarot P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Oct; 35(38):2655-62. PubMed ID: 24755006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis.
    Barone-Rochette G; Piérard S; Seldrum S; de Meester de Ravenstein C; Melchior J; Maes F; Pouleur AC; Vancraeynest D; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(6):1009-17. PubMed ID: 24100045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tricuspid Regurgitation Is Associated With Increased Risk of Mortality in Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Results of the Multicenter TOPAS Study (True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis).
    Dahou A; Magne J; Clavel MA; Capoulade R; Bartko PE; Bergler-Klein J; Sénéchal M; Mundigler G; Burwash I; Ribeiro HB; O'Connor K; Mathieu P; Baumgartner H; Dumesnil JG; Rosenhek R; Larose E; Rodés-Cabau J; Pibarot P
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):588-96. PubMed ID: 25819185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in natural history of low- and high-gradient aortic stenosis from nonsevere to severe stage of the disease.
    Herrmann S; Fries B; Liu D; Hu K; Stoerk S; Voelker W; Ruppert C; Lorenz K; Ertl G; Weidemann F
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 Nov; 28(11):1270-1282.e4. PubMed ID: 26321001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction.
    Maes F; Pierard S; de Meester C; Boulif J; Amzulescu M; Vancraeynest D; Pouleur AC; Pasquet A; Gerber B; Vanoverschelde JL
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):37. PubMed ID: 28292302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of the ascending aorta diameter in patients with severe bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis using dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.
    Son JY; Ko SM; Choi JW; Song MG; Hwang HK; Lee SJ; Kang JW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Dec; 27 Suppl 1():61-71. PubMed ID: 22009020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aortic root geometry in patients with aortic stenosis assessed by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.
    Wu VC; Kaku K; Takeuchi M; Otani K; Yoshitani H; Tamura M; Abe H; Lin FC; Otsuji Y
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jan; 27(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 24238752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left ventricular mechanical dispersion in flow-gradient patterns of severe aortic stenosis with narrow QRS complex.
    Lavall D; Kuprat LK; Kandels J; Stöbe S; Hagendorff A; Laufs U
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Apr; 36(4):605-614. PubMed ID: 31933102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence of subannular and left ventricular morphological differences in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.
    Disha K; Dubslaff G; Rouman M; Fey B; Borger MA; Barker AJ; Kuntze T; Girdauskas E
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 28040769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aortic stenosis severity is not a risk factor for poststenotic dilatation of the ascending aorta.
    Linhartová K; Beránek V; Sefrna F; Hanisová I; Sterbáková G; Pesková M
    Circ J; 2007 Jan; 71(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17186983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Severe aortic stenosis patients with preserved ejection fraction according to flow and gradient classification: Prevalence and outcomes.
    González Gómez A; Fernández-Golfín C; Monteagudo JM; Izurieta C; Hinojar R; García A; Casas E; Jiménez-Nacher JJ; Moya JL; Ruiz S; Zamorano JL
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 248():211-215. PubMed ID: 28864136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of structural geometry on the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis.
    Richards KE; Deserranno D; Donal E; Greenberg NL; Thomas JD; Garcia MJ
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2004 Sep; 287(3):H1410-6. PubMed ID: 15117719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of Mortality and Symptomatic Outcome of Patients With Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Mangner N; Stachel G; Woitek F; Haussig S; Schlotter F; Höllriegel R; Adam J; Lindner A; Mohr FW; Schuler G; Kiefer P; Leontyev S; Borger MA; Thiele H; Holzhey D; Linke A
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Apr; 7(8):. PubMed ID: 29654191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the geometry of the left ventricle outflow tract, the aortic root and the ascending aorta in patients with severe tricuspid aortic stenosis versus healthy controls.
    Nieznańska M; Zatorska K; Stokłosa P; Ryś M; Duchnowski P; Szymański P; Hryniewiecki T; Michałowska I
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):357-366. PubMed ID: 31686278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective assessment of the frequency of low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: Critical impact of aortic flow misalignment and pressure recovery phenomenon.
    Ringle A; Castel AL; Le Goffic C; Delelis F; Binda C; Bohbot Y; Ennezat PV; Guerbaai RA; Levy F; Vincentelli A; Graux P; Tribouilloy C; Maréchaux S
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018; 111(8-9):518-527. PubMed ID: 29439881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CFD- and Bernoulli-based pressure drop estimates: A comparison using patient anatomies from heart and aortic valve segmentation of CT images.
    Weese J; Lungu A; Peters J; Weber FM; Waechter-Stehle I; Hose DR
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2281-2292. PubMed ID: 28276071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of the multicenter TOPAS Study.
    Clavel MA; Fuchs C; Burwash IG; Mundigler G; Dumesnil JG; Baumgartner H; Bergler-Klein J; Beanlands RS; Mathieu P; Magne J; Pibarot P
    Circulation; 2008 Sep; 118(14 Suppl):S234-42. PubMed ID: 18824760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.