These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31788792)
21. From idea to genuine progress. Benson P J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 37(2):75. PubMed ID: 20567028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Rethinking the dreaded r-word. Enserink M Science; 2017 Jun; 356(6342):998. PubMed ID: 28596320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Ethics of Ironic Science in Its Search for Spoof. Ronagh M; Souder L Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1537-49. PubMed ID: 25510233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. When things go wrong: correcting the scientific record. Pulverer B EMBO J; 2015 Oct; 34(20):2483-5. PubMed ID: 26467018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Writing yourself or copying--is it really new?]. Haug C Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Aug; 125(15):1985. PubMed ID: 16100530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Why articles continue to be cited after they have been retracted: An audit of retraction notices. Gray R; Al-Ghareeb A; McKenna L Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Feb; 90():11-12. PubMed ID: 30476725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Investigation results in disciplinary action against researchers, retraction of articles. Zylke JW JAMA; 1989 Oct; 262(14):1910-1, 1915. PubMed ID: 2674491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2012 Jan; 48(1):1. PubMed ID: 22188040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The role and responsibilities of coauthors. Lancet; 2008 Sep; 372(9641):778. PubMed ID: 18774402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs; 2012 Feb; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22299799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Publication ethics: Its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2012 Jan; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22243674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A withdrawn prepublication. Dean PB Lancet; 2007 Mar; 369(9565):901. PubMed ID: 17368138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Scientific publishing. Withdrawn parasite paper stirs criticism of cell. Holden C Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5745):34. PubMed ID: 16210508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Retractions are increasing, but not enough. Oransky I Nature; 2022 Aug; 608(7921):9. PubMed ID: 35918520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Integrity measures take its toll: Introducing a complete supplement issue with retractions only. Behl C J Cell Biochem; 2021 Nov; 122 Suppl 1():S7. PubMed ID: 34715723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time. Edsall JT Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 11657783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Correcting the Medical Literature: "To Err Is Human, to Correct Divine". Christiansen L; Flanagin A JAMA; 2017 Sep; 318(9):804-805. PubMed ID: 28873144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008. Wager E; Williams P J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 21486985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]