These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31788997)

  • 1. Selection criteria and colpotomic approach for safe minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer.
    Kong TW; Son JH; Paek J; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):e7. PubMed ID: 31788997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Piao X; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Chun M; Ryu HS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 26554751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
    Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Song YL; Li RZ; Feng BJ; Lu YH; Wang LF; Wang ZY; Pei KG; Sun LF; Li R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 50(4):108240. PubMed ID: 38457858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the Use of a Uterine Manipulator or Intracorporeal Colpotomy Confer an Inferior Prognosis in Minimally Invasive Surgery-Treated Early-stage Cervical Cancer?
    Wang R; Hu Y; Xia H; Zhu X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 36410659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protective Maneuver to Avoid Tumor Spillage during Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Vaginal Cuff Closure.
    Lago V; Tiermes M; Padilla-Iserte P; Matute L; Gurrea M; Domingo S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 32540498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effects of colpotomic approaches on prognosis and recurrence sites of stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy].
    Zhou D; Li YD; Ling KJ; Wang RW; Wang YZ; Tang S; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 58(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 36720615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in predicting parametrial invasion in cervical stromal ring focally disrupted stage IB-IIA cervical cancers.
    Song J; Hu Q; Ma Z; Zhang J; Chen T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Sep; 44(9):3166-3174. PubMed ID: 31377834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic factors influencing pelvic, extra-pelvic, and intraperitoneal recurrences in lymph node-negative early-stage cervical cancer patients following radical hysterectomy.
    Kong TW; Son JH; Paek J; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Sep; 252():94-99. PubMed ID: 32590168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoendoscopic Single-site Radical Hysterectomy with Vaginal Closure and without Uterine Manipulator for FIGO IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Chen S; Zheng Y; Tong L; Zhao X; Chen L; Wang Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1471-1472. PubMed ID: 31926301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperatively Assessable Clinical and Pathological Risk Factors for Parametrial Involvement in Surgically Treated FIGO Stage IB-IIA Cervical Cancer.
    Canaz E; Ozyurek ES; Erdem B; Aldikactioglu Talmac M; Yildiz Ozaydin I; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulker V
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Oct; 27(8):1722-1728. PubMed ID: 28617687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
    Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 33635013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SUCCOR morbidity: complications in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer.
    Vázquez-Vicente D; Boria F; Castellanos T; Gutierrez M; Chacon E; Manzour N; Minguez JA; Martin-Calvo N; Alcazar JL; Chiva L;
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 Feb; 34(2):203-208. PubMed ID: 38669163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is minimally invasive radical surgery safe for patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size? (MISAFE): Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLborAtion study (GORILLA-1003).
    Kong TW; Kim J; Son JH; Lee AJ; Yang EJ; Shim SH; Kim NK; Kim Y; Suh DH; Hwang DW; Park SJ; Kim HS; Lee YY; Yoo JG; Lee SJ; Chang SJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 176():122-129. PubMed ID: 37515926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.