These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31788997)

  • 21. Investigating the possible impact of peritoneal tumor exposure amongst women with early stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive approach.
    Pedone Anchora L; Bizzarri N; Kucukmetin A; Turco LC; Gallotta V; Carbone V; Rundle S; Ratnavelu N; Cosentino F; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Fedele C; Gomes N; Ferrandina G; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 47(5):1090-1097. PubMed ID: 33039294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nitecki R; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Krause KJ; Tergas AI; Wright JD; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Jul; 6(7):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 32525511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
    Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups.
    Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Klapdor R; Hertel H; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 304(3):577-587. PubMed ID: 34021804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
    Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy with Enclosed Colpotomy and without the Use of Uterine Manipulator for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Yuan P; Liu Z; Qi J; Yang X; Hu T; Tan H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1193-1198. PubMed ID: 30802608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The value of MRI in quantification of parametrial invasion and association with prognosis in locally advanced cervical cancer: the "PLACE" study.
    Russo L; Pasciuto T; Lupinelli M; Urbano A; D'Erme L; Amerighi A; Fanfani F; Scambia G; Manfredi R; Sala E; Ferrandina G; Gui B
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):4003-4013. PubMed ID: 37981591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A real-world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017.
    Guo C; Tang X; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Guo J; Lei X; Qiu J; Hua K
    Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):5908-5921. PubMed ID: 32628356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Valuable Tool for Predicting Parametrial Invasion in Stage IB1 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer.
    Kim M; Suh DH; Kim K; Lee HJ; Kim YB; No JH
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):332-338. PubMed ID: 28114236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transvaginal cervical tumor-concealing no-look no-touch technique in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel operation technique.
    Kanao H; Fusegi A; Omi M; Youssefzadeh AC; Nomura H; Matsuo K
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e27. PubMed ID: 36562133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prognostic Factors and Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix.
    Kim JH; Shim SH; Nam SH; Lee SW; Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1558-1565. PubMed ID: 32084588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.
    Uppal S; Gehrig PA; Peng K; Bixel KL; Matsuo K; Vetter MH; Davidson BA; Cisa MP; Lees BF; Brunette LL; Tucker K; Stuart Staley A; Gotlieb WH; Holloway RW; Essel KG; Holman LL; Goldfeld E; Olawaiye A; Rose SL
    J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 38(10):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 32031867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer with incidentally identified high-risk factors.
    Kim NR; Kim SI; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Choi CH; Lee M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():224-230. PubMed ID: 37229880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treatment outcomes in patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer and a focally disrupted cervical stromal ring on magnetic resonance imaging: A propensity score matching study.
    Kong TW; Lee JD; Son JH; Paek J; Chun M; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Oct; 143(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 27423377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Adenocarcinoma after Preoperative Brachytherapy in 10 Steps.
    Colombo PE; Nguyen VH; Taoum C; Mourregot A; Neron M; Kerr C; Rouanet P; Carrier G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1138-1139. PubMed ID: 33031927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.
    Ohta T; Nagase S; Okui Y; Enomoto T; Yamagami W; Mikami M; Tokunaga H; Ino K; Ushijima K; Shozu M; Tashiro H; Mandai M; Miyamoto S; Morishige KI; Yoshida Y; Yoshino K; Saito T; Kobayashi E; Kobayashi H; Takekuma M; Terai Y; Fujii T; Kanao H; Aoki D; Katabuchi H; Yaegashi N
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 26(12):2318-2330. PubMed ID: 34435284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preoperative nomogram for prediction of microscopic parametrial infiltration in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Kong TW; Kim J; Son JH; Kang SW; Paek J; Chun M; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 142(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 27179979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.