These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31789076)

  • 1. Fear and Derision: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Provaccine and Antivaccine Internet Memes.
    Harvey AM; Thompson S; Lac A; Coolidge FL
    Health Educ Behav; 2019 Dec; 46(6):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 31789076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Machine Learning to Compare Provaccine and Antivaccine Discourse Among the Public on Social Media: Algorithm Development Study.
    Argyris YA; Monu K; Tan PN; Aarts C; Jiang F; Wiseley KA
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Jun; 7(6):e23105. PubMed ID: 34185004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaccination persuasion online: a qualitative study of two provaccine and two vaccine-skeptical websites.
    Grant L; Hausman BL; Cashion M; Lucchesi N; Patel K; Roberts J
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e133. PubMed ID: 26024907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Social Media Virality: Content Analysis of Message Themes and Writing Strategies.
    Ngai CSB; Singh RG; Yao L
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jul; 24(7):e37806. PubMed ID: 35731969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Association Between Dissemination and Characteristics of Pro-/Anti-COVID-19 Vaccine Messages on Twitter: Application of the Elaboration Likelihood Model.
    Saini V; Liang LL; Yang YC; Le HM; Wu CY
    JMIR Infodemiology; 2022; 2(1):e37077. PubMed ID: 35783451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining Homophily, Language Coordination, and Analytical Thinking in Web-Based Conversations About Vaccines on Reddit: Study Using Deep Neural Network Language Models and Computer-Assisted Conversational Analyses.
    Li Y; Gee W; Jin K; Bond R
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Mar; 25():e41882. PubMed ID: 36951921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trend of influenza vaccine Facebook posts in last 4 years: a content analysis.
    Gandhi CK; Patel J; Zhan X
    Am J Infect Control; 2020 Apr; 48(4):361-367. PubMed ID: 32098695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vaccine criticism: Presence and arguments on French-speaking websites.
    Nugier A; Limousi F; Lydié N
    Med Mal Infect; 2018 Feb; 48(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 29031651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Down the Rabbit Hole" of Vaccine Misinformation on YouTube: Network Exposure Study.
    Tang L; Fujimoto K; Amith MT; Cunningham R; Costantini RA; York F; Xiong G; Boom JA; Tao C
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jan; 23(1):e23262. PubMed ID: 33399543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publicly Available Online Tool Facilitates Real-Time Monitoring Of Vaccine Conversations And Sentiments.
    Bahk CY; Cumming M; Paushter L; Madoff LC; Thomson A; Brownstein JS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2016 Feb; 35(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 26858390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of Antivaccine Messages on Social Media: Systematic Review.
    Wawrzuta D; Jaworski M; Gotlib J; Panczyk M
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jun; 23(6):e24564. PubMed ID: 34085943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Viral suspicions: Vaccine hesitancy in the Web 2.0.
    Salvador Casara BG; Suitner C; Bettinsoli ML
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):354-371. PubMed ID: 30816729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antivaccination activists on the world wide web.
    Davies P; Chapman S; Leask J
    Arch Dis Child; 2002 Jul; 87(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 12089115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does Scientific Publication Inform Public Discourse? A Case Study Observing Social Media Engagement Around Vaccinations.
    Nelon JL; Moscarelli M; Stupka P; Sumners C; Uselton T; Patterson MS
    Health Promot Pract; 2021 May; 22(3):377-384. PubMed ID: 32009444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vaccine Hesitancy and Online Information: The Influence of Digital Networks.
    Getman R; Helmi M; Roberts H; Yansane A; Cutler D; Seymour B
    Health Educ Behav; 2018 Aug; 45(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 29267129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Internet Memes in PSAs: Roles of Perceived Emotion, Involvement with Memes, and Attitudes Toward the Issuing Organization in Perceived PSA Effectiveness.
    Hong SJ; Low BYF
    Health Commun; 2024 May; 39(6):1185-1197. PubMed ID: 37143295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaccine criticism on the World Wide Web.
    Zimmerman RK; Wolfe RM; Fox DE; Fox JR; Nowalk MP; Troy JA; Sharp LK
    J Med Internet Res; 2005 Jun; 7(2):e17. PubMed ID: 15998608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using efficacy cues in persuasive health communication is more effective than employing threats - An experimental study of a vaccination intervention against Ebola.
    Ort A; Fahr A
    Br J Health Psychol; 2018 Sep; 23(3):665-684. PubMed ID: 29635864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adapting and Extending a Typology to Identify Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter.
    Jamison A; Broniatowski DA; Smith MC; Parikh KS; Malik A; Dredze M; Quinn SC
    Am J Public Health; 2020 Oct; 110(S3):S331-S339. PubMed ID: 33001737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vaccine-criticism on the internet: new insights based on French-speaking websites.
    Ward JK; Peretti-Watel P; Larson HJ; Raude J; Verger P
    Vaccine; 2015 Feb; 33(8):1063-70. PubMed ID: 25583384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.