These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31789119)

  • 1. A comparison of bolus insulin dose errors based on results of a clinical trial of five blood glucose monitoring systems.
    Pardo S; Dunne N; Simmons DA
    Ther Deliv; 2019 Dec; 10(12):793-799. PubMed ID: 31789119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bolus Insulin Dose Error Distributions Based on Results From Two Clinical Trials Comparing Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.
    Pardo S; Dunne N; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 11(5):970-974. PubMed ID: 28604064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Accuracy of Six Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems and Modeling of Possibly Related Insulin Dosing Errors.
    Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Pleus S; Haug C; Freckmann G
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Oct; 19(10):580-588. PubMed ID: 28704063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.
    Bedini JL; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Petruschke T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 10(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26445813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic.
    Thomas LE; Kane MP; Bakst G; Busch RS; Hamilton RA; Abelseth JM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Apr; 10(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 18260773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of five systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose in the hands of adult lay-users and professionals applying ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria and potential insulin dosing errors.
    Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Liebing C; Kamecke U; Haug C; Freckmann G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2019 Feb; 35(2):301-311. PubMed ID: 29927663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.
    Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects.
    Tack C; Pohlmeier H; Behnke T; Schmid V; Grenningloh M; Forst T; Pfützner A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Apr; 14(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 22176154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr; 19(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 28225633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision, accuracy, and user acceptance of the OneTouch SelectSimple blood glucose monitoring system.
    Philis-Tsimikas A; Chang A; Miller L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Nov; 5(6):1602-9. PubMed ID: 22226284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy Evaluation of CONTOUR(®)PLUS Compared With Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.
    Dunne N; Viggiani MT; Pardo S; Robinson C; Parkes JL
    Diabetes Ther; 2015 Sep; 6(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 26169192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015.
    Pleus S; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Mende J; Link M; Zschornack E; Haug C; Freckmann G
    BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2020 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 31958308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of "Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial".
    Fournier PA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1305-7. PubMed ID: 24124958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Importance of blood glucose meter and carbohydrate estimation accuracy.
    Virdi NS; Mahoney JJ
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 6(4):921-6. PubMed ID: 22920820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial.
    Halldorsdottir S; Warchal-Windham ME; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Parkes JL; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1294-304. PubMed ID: 24124957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrated self-monitoring of blood glucose system: handling step analysis.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Ruhland K; Baumstark A; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 6(4):938-46. PubMed ID: 22920822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of radar plots to compare the analytical performance of five blood glucose monitoring systems.
    Pardo S; Dunne N; Simmons DA
    Ther Deliv; 2019 Dec; 10(12):783-792. PubMed ID: 31674291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy Beyond ISO: Introducing a New Method for Distinguishing Differences Between Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Meeting ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Requirements.
    Pardo S; Shaginian RM; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 May; 12(3):650-656. PubMed ID: 29542346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. User Performance Evaluation and System Accuracy Assessment of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems With Color Coding of Measurement Results.
    Pleus S; Baumstark A; Schauer S; Kölle J; Jendrike N; Mende J; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 May; 18(3):644-652. PubMed ID: 36433806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the effects of insufficient blood volume samples on the performance of blood glucose self-test meters.
    Pfützner A; Schipper C; Ramljak S; Flacke F; Sieber J; Forst T; Musholt PB
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1522-9. PubMed ID: 24351178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.