246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31789538)
1. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
Friese M; Frankenbach J
Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve.
van Aert RC; Wicherts JM; van Assen MA
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):713-729. PubMed ID: 27694466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modelling publication bias and p-hacking.
Moss J; De Bin R
Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):319-331. PubMed ID: 34510407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.
Head ML; Holman L; Lanfear R; Kahn AT; Jennions MD
PLoS Biol; 2015 Mar; 13(3):e1002106. PubMed ID: 25768323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Some properties of p-curves, with an application to gradual publication bias.
Ulrich R; Miller J
Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):546-560. PubMed ID: 28425729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Bayesian "fill-in" method for correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
Du H; Liu F; Wang L
Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):799-817. PubMed ID: 29265851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the change in meta-analytic effect size estimates after the application of publication bias adjustment methods.
Sladekova M; Webb LEA; Field AP
Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):664-686. PubMed ID: 35446048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.
Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 26186117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. P-hacking in meta-analyses: A formalization and new meta-analytic methods.
Mathur MB
Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):483-499. PubMed ID: 38273211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study.
Kicinski M
BMJ Open; 2014 Aug; 4(8):e004831. PubMed ID: 25168036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 99% impossible: A valid, or falsifiable, internal meta-analysis.
Vosgerau J; Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1628-1639. PubMed ID: 31464485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A parsimonious weight function for modeling publication bias.
Citkowicz M; Vevea JL
Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 28252998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating publication bias in meta-analyses of peer-reviewed studies: A meta-meta-analysis across disciplines and journal tiers.
Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):176-191. PubMed ID: 33108053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Meta-analyses and P-curves support robust cycle shifts in women's mate preferences: Reply to Wood and Carden (2014) and Harris, Pashler, and Mickes (2014)": Correction to Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014).
Psychol Bull; 2017 Nov; 143(11):iii. PubMed ID: 29048180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is There Evidence of P-Hacking in Imaging Research?
Rooprai P; Islam N; Salameh JP; Ebrahimzadeh S; Kazi A; Frank R; Ramsay T; Mathur MB; Absi M; Khalil A; Kazi S; Dawit H; Lam E; Fabiano N; McInnes MDF
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2023 Aug; 74(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 36412994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods for addressing publication bias in school psychology journals: A descriptive review of meta-analyses from 1980 to 2019.
McClain MB; Callan GL; Harris B; Floyd RG; Haverkamp CR; Golson ME; Longhurst DN; Benallie KJ
J Sch Psychol; 2021 Feb; 84():74-94. PubMed ID: 33581772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is replication possible without fidelity?
Ellefson MR; Oppenheimer DM
Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1446-1455. PubMed ID: 35049324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
