These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31789538)

  • 21. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
    van Assen MA; van Aert RC; Wicherts JM
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 25401773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Examining publication bias-a simulation-based evaluation of statistical tests on publication bias.
    Schneck A
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e4115. PubMed ID: 29204324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Footprint of publication selection bias on meta-analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics.
    Bartoš F; Maier M; Wagenmakers EJ; Nippold F; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JPA; Otte WM; Sladekova M; Deresssa TK; Bruns SB; Fanelli D; Stanley TD
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):500-511. PubMed ID: 38327122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.
    Thornton A; Lee P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 53(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 10729693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Times are changing, bias isn't: A meta-meta-analysis on publication bias detection practices, prevalence rates, and predictors in industrial/organizational psychology.
    Siegel M; Eder JSN; Wicherts JM; Pietschnig J
    J Appl Psychol; 2022 Nov; 107(11):2013-2039. PubMed ID: 34968082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
    Schneck A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292717. PubMed ID: 37847689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A kinked meta-regression model for publication bias correction.
    Bom PRD; Rachinger H
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):497-514. PubMed ID: 31039283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the risk of bias in choice of search sources for environmental meta-analyses.
    Konno K; Pullin AS
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Sep; 11(5):698-713. PubMed ID: 32618107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correcting bias in the meta-analysis of correlations.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Maier M; Bartoš F
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38829357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robust Bayesian meta-analysis: Addressing publication bias with model-averaging.
    Maier M; Bartoš F; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):107-122. PubMed ID: 35588075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P; Dorotka R
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; Wicherts JM; van Assen MALM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215052. PubMed ID: 30978228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Toward a more transparent, rigorous, and generative psychology.
    Johnson BT
    Psychol Bull; 2021 Jan; 147(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 33464105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012).
    Rothstein HR; Bushman BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 22369520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hybrid test for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2881-2899. PubMed ID: 32290810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neglect of publication bias compromises meta-analyses of educational research.
    Ropovik I; Adamkovic M; Greger D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252415. PubMed ID: 34081730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Harnessing the power of excess statistical significance: Weighted and iterative least squares.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):407-420. PubMed ID: 35549315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Why selective publication of statistically significant results can be effective.
    de Winter J; Happee R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66463. PubMed ID: 23840479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.