178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31790912)
1. The influence of the location of ordered symbols on the ordinal position effect: The involvement of the task performed.
Shi W; Wang Q; Deng M; Xu D
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jan; 202():102978. PubMed ID: 31790912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Approach and avoidance movements are unaffected by cognitive conflict: a comparison of the Simon effect and stimulus-response compatibility.
Kerzel D; Buetti S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 22454332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The spatial coding mechanism of ordinal symbols: a study based on the ordinal position effect.
Shi W; Wang Q; Zhao F; Zhao X
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1051-1062. PubMed ID: 31758525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interaction mechanism between location and sequence in letter cognition.
Wang Q; An B; Yue H; Tao W; Shi W
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jun; 217():103329. PubMed ID: 33984573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sex differences in implicit processing of allocentric relationships between objects and location in a Simon task.
Mosso M; Freudenberg A; McCracken K; McGivern RF
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235964. PubMed ID: 32697771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parametric exploration of the Simon effect across visual space.
Klein RM; Dove ME; Ivanoff J; Eskes GA
Can J Exp Psychol; 2006 Jun; 60(2):112-26. PubMed ID: 17133887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.
Ansorge U; Wühr P
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Taking time to take perspective? Rapidly changing reference frames in the avatar-Simon task.
Böffel C; Müsseler J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103005. PubMed ID: 32058077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of Number Location on the SNARC Effect: Evidence From the Processing of Rotated Traditional Chinese Numerical Words.
Wang Z; Zhu X; Jiang Y
Iperception; 2020; 11(2):2041669520917169. PubMed ID: 32284844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How different direct association routes influence the indirect route in the same Simon-like task.
Luo C; Proctor RW
Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1733-1748. PubMed ID: 29761377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential dynamics of spatial and non-spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects: a dual task LRP study.
Lehle C; Cohen A; Sangals J; Sommer W; Stürmer B
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 21030005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.
Didino D; Breil C; Knops A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():75-86. PubMed ID: 31004938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Similarities and differences between interference from stimulus position and from direction of an arrow: behavioral and event-related potential measures.
Cespón J; Galdo-Álvarez S; Díaz F
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 23856354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of working memory load on the Simon effect.
Zhao X; Chen A; West R
Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):687-92. PubMed ID: 21037167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Space and Motion Stimulus-Response Correspondence (SRC) Effects in a Single Task.
Styrkowiec P
Exp Psychol; 2016 Sep; 63(5):297-306. PubMed ID: 27832733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?
Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Mishler S; Proctor RW
Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 28946804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Task-defined associations are mode specific for selection of relevant dimension but mode independent for selection of location mapping.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):370-91. PubMed ID: 18609411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
