These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31791160)

  • 1. Clinical utility of pre-endoscopy risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Tham J; Stanley A
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Dec; 13(12):1161-1167. PubMed ID: 31791160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
    Reed EA; Dalton H; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Cahill A; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Forrest EH; Morris J; Stanley AJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department.
    Aquarius M; Smeets FG; Konijn HW; Stassen PM; Keulen ET; Van Deursen CT; Masclee AA; Keulemans YC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1011-6. PubMed ID: 26049709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice.
    Waddell KM; Stanley AJ
    Hosp Pract (1995); 2015; 43(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 26536295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Saffouri E; Blackwell C; Laursen SB; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Shultz M; Norton R; Stanley AJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan; 51(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31642558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
    Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
    Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
    Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
    Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strengths and limitations of risk stratification tools for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a narrative review.
    Alali AA; Boustany A; Martel M; Barkun AN
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023; 17(8):795-803. PubMed ID: 37496492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.
    Zhong M; Chen WJ; Lu XY; Qian J; Zhu CQ
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.