These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31791324)
1. Applying intraoral scanner to residual ridge in edentulous regions: in vitro evaluation of inter-operator validity to confirm trueness. Tasaka A; Uekubo Y; Mitsui T; Kasahara T; Takanashi T; Homma S; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Yoshinari M; Yajima Y; Sakurai K; Yamashita S BMC Oral Health; 2019 Dec; 19(1):264. PubMed ID: 31791324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study. Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans. Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the impact of the extent of the partially edentulous area on the accuracy of two intraoral scanners. Alfaraj A; Khanlar LN; Lin WS; Zandinejad A J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):163.e1-163.e8. PubMed ID: 37891042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The trueness of scans using one intraoral scanner in different partially edentulous conditions. Majeed-Saidan A; Dutra V; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Alfaraj A; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):588-593. PubMed ID: 35977883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new proposal for improving the accuracy of intraoral scanning for partially edentulous residual ridge. Shimizu T; Tasaka A; Wadachi J; Yamashita S J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Apr; 67(2):246-254. PubMed ID: 36031353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience. Revell G; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans ZP; Renne W; Ludlow M; Vág J J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):632-638. PubMed ID: 33832761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis. Schimmel M; Akino N; Srinivasan M; Wittneben JG; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1839-1847. PubMed ID: 32812098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. Hayama H; Fueki K; Wadachi J; Wakabayashi N J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 29502933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy analysis of complete-arch digital scans in edentulous arches when using an auxiliary geometric device. Iturrate M; Eguiraun H; Etxaniz O; Solaberrieta E J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):447-454. PubMed ID: 30554826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature]. Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Trueness of intraoral scanning of edentulous arches: A comparative clinical study. Al Hamad KQ; Al-Kaff FT J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 35997079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study. Braian M; Wennerberg A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: A 3D analysis study. Alzahrani SJ; El-Hammali H; Morgano SM; Elkassaby H J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):787-792. PubMed ID: 33172647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch. Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Scanning Strategy and Scanner Type on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: A New Approach for Assessing the Accuracy of Scanned Data. Oh KC; Park JM; Moon HS J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):518-523. PubMed ID: 32133690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence. Diker B; Tak Ö Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 33570525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]