These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31791938)
1. Comments on the CRISPR Gene-edited babies' case. Cong Y Indian J Med Ethics; 2019; 4 (NS)(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 31791938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Starting the conversation: CRISPR's role in India. Udwadia F; Singh S Indian J Med Ethics; 2019; 4 (NS)(4):300-303. PubMed ID: 31213419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human Genome-Edited Babies: First Responder with Concerns Regarding Possible Neurological Deficits! Baig AM ACS Chem Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 10(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 30556694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experiments that led to the first gene-edited babies: the ethical failings and the urgent need for better governance. Li JR; Walker S; Nie JB; Zhang XQ J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2019 Jan.; 20(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 30614228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gene Editing may have Increased Mortality for Chinese Twins. Am J Med Genet A; 2019 Sep; 179(9):1685-1686. PubMed ID: 31393086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Designer babies?!" A CRISPR-based learning module for undergraduates built around the CCR5 gene. Pieczynski JN; Kee HL Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2021 Jan; 49(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 32777177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Crispr-Cas9 Gene Editing Revolution and the Its Ethical and Legal Challenges]. Bellver Capella V Cuad Bioet; 2016; 27(90):223-39. PubMed ID: 27637196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The better edge of the CRISPR blade. The Lancet Lancet; 2020 Jan; 395(10218):90. PubMed ID: 31929016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. China focuses on ethics to deter another 'CRISPR babies' scandal. Mallapaty S Nature; 2022 May; 605(7908):15-16. PubMed ID: 35478023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The First Chinese Edited Babies: A Leap of Faith in Science. Raposo VL JBRA Assist Reprod; 2019 Aug; 23(3):197-199. PubMed ID: 31436399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Consent Form in the Chinese CRISPR Study: In Search of Ethical GeneĀ Editing. Shaw D J Bioeth Inq; 2020 Mar; 17(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 31900853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous Knockout of CXCR4 and CCR5 Genes in CD4+ T Cells via CRISPR/Cas9 Confers Resistance to Both X4- and R5-Tropic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection. Yu S; Yao Y; Xiao H; Li J; Liu Q; Yang Y; Adah D; Lu J; Zhao S; Qin L; Chen X Hum Gene Ther; 2018 Jan; 29(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 28599597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. After the Storm - A Responsible Path for Genome Editing. Daley GQ; Lovell-Badge R; Steffann J N Engl J Med; 2019 Mar; 380(10):897-899. PubMed ID: 30649993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [CRISPR babies: technology and transgression]. Jordan B Med Sci (Paris); 2019 Mar; 35(3):266-270. PubMed ID: 30931913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Government report blasts creator of CRISPR twins. Normile D Science; 2019 Jan; 363(6425):328. PubMed ID: 30679349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. CRISPR and the Law: A South African Perspective. Soni S CRISPR J; 2020 Apr; 3(2):81-82. PubMed ID: 32315223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The CRISPR-baby scandal: what's next for human gene-editing. Cyranoski D Nature; 2019 Feb; 566(7745):440-442. PubMed ID: 30809070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]