These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31792321)

  • 1. Estimating Rates of Progression and Predicting Future Visual Fields in Glaucoma Using a Deep Variational Autoencoder.
    Berchuck SI; Mukherjee S; Medeiros FA
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18113. PubMed ID: 31792321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
    Wesselink C; Jansonius NM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep; 37(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 28836391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How Many Visual Fields Are Required to Precisely Predict Future Test Results in Glaucoma Patients When Using Different Trend Analyses?
    Taketani Y; Murata H; Fujino Y; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 56(6):4076-82. PubMed ID: 26114484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a pointwise linear regression analysis.
    Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(5):2862-9. PubMed ID: 24595388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forecasting future Humphrey Visual Fields using deep learning.
    Wen JC; Lee CS; Keane PA; Xiao S; Rokem AS; Chen PP; Wu Y; Lee AY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214875. PubMed ID: 30951547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Relative Odds of Progressing by Structural and Functional Tests in Glaucoma.
    Abe RY; Diniz-Filho A; Zangwill LM; Gracitelli CP; Marvasti AH; Weinreb RN; Baig S; Medeiros FA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jul; 57(9):OCT421-8. PubMed ID: 27409501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
    Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
    Bayer AU; Erb C
    Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reclaiming the Periphery: Automated Kinetic Perimetry for Measuring Peripheral Visual Fields in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Mönter VM; Crabb DP; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 58(2):868-875. PubMed ID: 28159974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting conversion to glaucoma using standard automated perimetry and frequency doubling technology.
    Takahashi G; Demirel S; Johnson CA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 255(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 28110356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting Vision-Related Disability in Glaucoma.
    Abe RY; Diniz-Filho A; Costa VP; Wu Z; Medeiros FA
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Jan; 125(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 29033061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma.
    Wang M; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Boland MV; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Wang H; Baniasadi N; Li D; Silva RNE; Bex PJ; Elze T
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Mar; 125(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 29103791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association Between Neurocognitive Decline and Visual Field Variability in Glaucoma.
    Diniz-Filho A; Delano-Wood L; Daga FB; Cronemberger S; Medeiros FA
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 135(7):734-739. PubMed ID: 28520873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual field progression with frequency-doubling matrix perimetry and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in healthy controls.
    Redmond T; O'Leary N; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; Artes PH; Chauhan BC
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1565-72. PubMed ID: 24177807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
    Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.
    Park HL; Lee J; Park CK
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma.
    Turalba AV; Grosskreutz C
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):309-16. PubMed ID: 21091017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Properties of the statpac visual field index.
    Artes PH; O'Leary N; Hutchison DM; Heckler L; Sharpe GP; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4030-8. PubMed ID: 21467169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.