These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31792771)

  • 1. Evaluation of SUV normalized by lean body mass (SUL) in
    Gafita A; Calais J; Franz C; Rauscher I; Wang H; Roberstson A; Czernin J; Weber WA; Eiber M
    EJNMMI Res; 2019 Dec; 9(1):103. PubMed ID: 31792771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is SUV Corrected for Lean Body Mass Superior to SUV of Body Weight in
    Aksu A; Çapa Kaya G
    Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2021 Oct; 30(3):144-149. PubMed ID: 34658229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimum lean body formulation for correction of standardized uptake value in PET imaging.
    Tahari AK; Chien D; Azadi JR; Wahl RL
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1481-4. PubMed ID: 24963129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid Standardized CT-Based Method to Determine Lean Body Mass SUV for PET-A Significant Improvement Over Prediction Equations.
    Riauka TA; Baracos VE; Reif R; Juengling FD; Robinson DM; Wieler M; McEwan AJB
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():812777. PubMed ID: 35875083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5.
    Ragab A; Wu J; Ding X; Clark A; Mischen B; Chauhan A; Oates ME; Anthony L; El Khouli R
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 34756348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting Weight-Normalized SUV and Lean-Body-Mass-Normalized SUV in PET Studies.
    Sarikaya I; Albatineh AN; Sarikaya A
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2020 Jun; 48(2):163-167. PubMed ID: 31604893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of PET/CT image reconstruction methods and liver uptake normalization strategies on quantitative image analysis.
    Kuhnert G; Boellaard R; Sterzer S; Kahraman D; Scheffler M; Wolf J; Dietlein M; Drzezga A; Kobe C
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):249-258. PubMed ID: 26280981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multivariate analysis of various factors affecting background liver and mediastinal standardized uptake values.
    Kuruva M; Mittal BR; Abrar ML; Kashyap R; Bhattacharya A
    Indian J Nucl Med; 2012 Jan; 27(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 23599593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of SUVlean consistency in FDG and PSMA PET/MR with Dixon-, James-, and Janma-based lean body mass correction.
    Zhao J; Xue Q; Chen X; You Z; Wang Z; Yuan J; Liu H; Hu L
    EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):17. PubMed ID: 33598849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of appropriate semi-quantitative index for assessment of esophageal and breast cancer treatment response in Japanese patients using
    Tsuchitani T; Takahashi Y; Maeda Y; Oda M; Enoki T; Kotoura N; Kitajima K
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 30843006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by F18-FDG PET/CT.
    Badawe EM; Abdel Gawad H; El-Nagdy MS; Khalil MM
    Eur J Hybrid Imaging; 2022 Oct; 6(1):22. PubMed ID: 36224438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semiquantitative Parameters in PSMA-Targeted PET Imaging with
    Li X; Rowe SP; Leal JP; Gorin MA; Allaf ME; Ross AE; Pienta KJ; Lodge MA; Pomper MG
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Jun; 58(6):942-946. PubMed ID: 27932557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability of Quantitative 18F-Fluoromethylcholine PET/CT Studies in Prostate Cancer.
    Oprea-Lager DE; Kramer G; van de Ven PM; van den Eertwegh AJ; van Moorselaar RJ; Schober P; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
    J Nucl Med; 2016 May; 57(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 26697964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of New Formulas for Lean Body Mass on Lean-Body-Mass-Normalized SUV in Oncologic
    Halsne T; Müller EG; Spiten AE; Sherwani AG; Gyland Mikalsen LT; Revheim ME; Stokke C
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Sep; 46(3):253-259. PubMed ID: 29599401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    Duan H; Baratto L; Hatami N; Liang T; Mari Aparici C; Davidzon GA; Iagaru A
    Transl Oncol; 2022 Jan; 15(1):101293. PubMed ID: 34823095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic PET/CT Imaging of
    Wang S; Zhou X; Xu X; Ding J; Liu T; Jiang J; Li N; Zhu H; Yang Z
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():651005. PubMed ID: 33777814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The value of liver-based standardized uptake value and other quantitative 18F-FDG PET-CT parameters in neoadjuvant therapy response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: correlation with histopathology.
    Koç M; Kaya GÇ; Demir Y; Sürücü E; Sarioğlu S; Obuz F; Öztop İ; Görken İB; Sökmen S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Sep; 36(9):898-907. PubMed ID: 25969176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The appropriate whole body metric for calculating standardised uptake value and the influence of sex.
    Keramida G; Peters AM
    Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Jan; 40(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 30521497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility and repeatability of same-day two sequential FDG PET/MR and PET/CT.
    Groshar D; Bernstine H; Goldberg N; Nidam M; Stein D; Abadi-Korek I; Domachevsky L
    Cancer Imaging; 2017 Apr; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 28381292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.