127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31793469)
1. Distortion and magnification of four digital cephalometric units.
Song GY; Li G; Lu WH; Han B; Xu TM
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1644-1653. PubMed ID: 31793469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image distortion and magnification of 3 digital CCD cephalometric systems.
Chadwick JW; Prentice RN; Major PW; Lam EW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 19101493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Panoramic and cephalometric extraoral dental radiograph systems.
American Dental Association, Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment
J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Dec; 133(12):1696-7. PubMed ID: 12512672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effect of positioning errors on magnification factors in the mandible in digital panorama imaging].
Schulze R; Schalldach F; d'Hoedt B
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 May; 4(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 10900960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography.
Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Wyatt J; Van Dam J; Nowak B; Jacobs R
Br Dent J; 2004 Aug; 197(3):149-52; discussion 140. PubMed ID: 15311250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.
Chen YJ; Chen SK; Huang HW; Yao CC; Chang HF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 15585806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of dimensional and angular measurements from panoramic and lateral oblique radiographs.
Wyatt DL; Farman AG; Orbell GM; Silveira AM; Scarfe WC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 9161166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms.
Collins J; Shah A; McCarthy C; Sandler J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 18068604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography.
Visser H; Rödig T; Hermann KP
Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 11407766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography.
Schulze R; Krummenauer F; Schalldach F; d'Hoedt B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10654037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.
Vazquez L; Nizamaldin Y; Combescure C; Nedir R; Bischof M; Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Carrel JP; Belser UC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):20110429. PubMed ID: 23360688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The DenOptix digital radiographic system.
Menig JJ
J Clin Orthod; 1999 Jul; 33(7):407-10. PubMed ID: 10535024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.
Santoro M; Jarjoura K; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16527629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Size estimation and magnification error in radiographic imaging: implications for classification of arteriovenous malformations.
Elisevich K; Cunningham IA; Assis L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1995 Mar; 16(3):531-8. PubMed ID: 7793378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing digital and conventional cephalometric radiographs.
Cohen JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 16102396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
