These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31793469)

  • 21. Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis.
    Devlin H; Yuan J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):29951683. PubMed ID: 22933529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of landmark identification and linear and angular measurements in conventional and digital cephalometry.
    Akhare PJ; Dagab AM; Alle RS; Shenoyd U; Garla V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 24364195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shielding effect of thyroid collar for digital panoramic radiography.
    Han GS; Cheng JG; Li G; Ma XC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130265. PubMed ID: 24005060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy and prediction of asymmetry in panoramic radiographic images.
    Laster WS; Ludlow JB; Bailey LJ; Hershey HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Nov; 34(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 16227476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measurement accuracy with a new dental panoramic radiographic technique based on tomosynthesis.
    Kitai N; Mukai Y; Murabayashi M; Kawabata A; Washino K; Matsuoka M; Shimizu I; Katsumata A
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jan; 83(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 22612390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Characteristics of the Orthopantomograph OP 100.
    Scarfe WC; Eraso FE; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9482025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A method for correcting for errors produced by variable magnification in three-dimensional tuned-aperture computed tomography.
    Webber RL; Bettermann W
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 10490750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms.
    Hagemann K; Vollmer D; Niegel T; Ehmer U; Reuter I
    J Orofac Orthop; 2000; 61(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 10783561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of CT scanograms and cephalometric radiographs in craniofacial imaging.
    Chidiac JJ; Shofer FS; Al-Kutoub A; Laster LL; Ghafari J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 May; 5(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 12086325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of magnification on lateral cephalometric studies.
    Dibbets JM; Nolte K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Aug; 122(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 12165775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.
    Varghese S; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Vikraman B; Chithranjan A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 20395462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size.
    Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 19221809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ceph-X: development and evaluation of 2D cephalometric system.
    Mosleh MA; Baba MS; Malek S; Almaktari RA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):499. PubMed ID: 28155649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation and Comparison of Self-Made and Commercial Calibration Markers for Radiographic Magnification Correction in Veterinary Digital Radiography.
    Klever J; de Motte A; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Brühschwein A
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2022 Jan; 35(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 34547786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automated calibration system for length measurement of lateral cephalometry based on deep learning.
    Jiang F; Guo Y; Zhou Y; Yang C; Xing K; Zhou J; Lin Y; Cheng F; Li J
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Nov; 67(22):. PubMed ID: 36206749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are children's dental panoramic tomographs and lateral cephalometric radiographs sufficiently optimized?
    Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Haukka J; Evälahti M; Waltimo-Sirén J
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 26483417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
    Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An accurate three-dimensional cephalometric system: a solution for the correction of cephalic malpositioning.
    Mori Y; Miyajima T; Minami K; Sakuda M
    J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 28(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 11395529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.