158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31794179)
41. Additively manufactured biomedical Ti-Nb-Ta-Zr lattices with tunable Young's modulus: Mechanical property, biocompatibility, and proteomics analysis.
Luo JP; Huang YJ; Xu JY; Sun JF; Dargusch MS; Hou CH; Ren L; Wang RZ; Ebel T; Yan M
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Sep; 114():110903. PubMed ID: 32994002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Fabrication and
Tang X; Qin Y; Xu X; Guo D; Ye W; Wu W; Li R
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():2076138. PubMed ID: 31815125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Three-dimensional printing of poly(glycerol sebacate fumarate) gadodiamide-poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate structures and characterization of mechanical properties for soft tissue applications.
Ravi P; Wright J; Shiakolas PS; Welch TR
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 Apr; 107(3):664-671. PubMed ID: 30096218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A Novel Low-Shrinkage Resin for 3D Printing.
Ling L; Taremi N; Malyala R
J Dent; 2022 Mar; 118():103957. PubMed ID: 35038476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. FABRICATION OF MULTILUMEN MICROFLUIDIC TUBING FOR
Felix BM; Young OM; Andreou JT; Sarker S; Fuge MD; Krieger A; Weiss CR; Bailey CR; Sochol RD
Proc IEEE Int Conf Micro Electro Mech Syst; 2024 Jan; 2024():1158-1161. PubMed ID: 38516341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Magnetic Field-Assisted Stereolithography for Productions of Multimaterial Hierarchical Surface Structures.
Joyee EB; Szmelter A; Eddington D; Pan Y
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Sep; 12(37):42357-42368. PubMed ID: 32815365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Influence of the stiffness of three-dimensionally bioprinted extracellular matrix analogue on the differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells into skin appendage cells].
; Zhang YJ; Li JJ; Yao B; Song W; Huang S; Fu XB
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 36(11):1013-1023. PubMed ID: 33238684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. New generation poly(ε-caprolactone)/gel-derived bioactive glass composites for bone tissue engineering: Part I. Material properties.
Dziadek M; Menaszek E; Zagrajczuk B; Pawlik J; Cholewa-Kowalska K
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Nov; 56():9-21. PubMed ID: 26249560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites.
Compton BG; Lewis JA
Adv Mater; 2014 Sep; 26(34):5930-5. PubMed ID: 24942232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. 3D printing of high-strength, porous, elastomeric structures to promote tissue integration of implants.
Abar B; Alonso-Calleja A; Kelly A; Kelly C; Gall K; West JL
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2021 Jan; 109(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 32418348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Enhanced bioactivity of titanium-coated polyetheretherketone implants created by a high-temperature 3D printing process.
Jung HD; Jang TS; Lee JE; Park SJ; Son Y; Park SH
Biofabrication; 2019 Aug; 11(4):045014. PubMed ID: 31365916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Investigation and comparison of resin materials in transparent DLP-printing for application in cell culture and organs-on-a-chip.
Fritschen A; Bell AK; Königstein I; Stühn L; Stark RW; Blaeser A
Biomater Sci; 2022 Apr; 10(8):1981-1994. PubMed ID: 35262097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Use of the polycation polyethyleneimine to improve the physical properties of alginate-hyaluronic acid hydrogel during fabrication of tissue repair scaffolds.
Rajaram A; Schreyer DJ; Chen DX
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2015; 26(7):433-45. PubMed ID: 25661399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Shape fidelity, mechanical and biological performance of 3D printed polycaprolactone-bioactive glass composite scaffolds.
Baier RV; Contreras Raggio JI; Giovanetti CM; Palza H; Burda I; Terrasi G; Weisse B; De Freitas GS; Nyström G; Vivanco JF; Aiyangar AK
Biomater Adv; 2022 Mar; 134():112540. PubMed ID: 35525740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A novel 3D printing PCL/GelMA scaffold containing USPIO for MRI-guided bile duct repair.
Li H; Yin Y; Xiang Y; Liu H; Guo R
Biomed Mater; 2020 May; 15(4):045004. PubMed ID: 32092713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. CAD/CAM milled complete removable dental prostheses: An in vitro evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface roughness.
Srinivasan M; Gjengedal H; Cattani-Lorente M; Moussa M; Durual S; Schimmel M; Müller F
Dent Mater J; 2018 Jul; 37(4):526-533. PubMed ID: 29515054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Cellular reactions of osteoblasts to micron- and submicron-scale porous structures of titanium surfaces.
Zhu X; Chen J; Scheideler L; Altebaeumer T; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Kern D
Cells Tissues Organs; 2004; 178(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 15550756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Mechanical properties of 3-D printed polyvinyl alcohol matrix for detection of respiratory pathogens.
Al-Taie A; Pan J; Polak P; Barer MR; Han X; Abbott AP
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Dec; 112():104066. PubMed ID: 32942228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Three-Dimensional Printing of Biodegradable Piperazine-Based Polyurethane-Urea Scaffolds with Enhanced Osteogenesis for Bone Regeneration.
Ma Y; Hu N; Liu J; Zhai X; Wu M; Hu C; Li L; Lai Y; Pan H; Lu WW; Zhang X; Luo Y; Ruan C
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 Mar; 11(9):9415-9424. PubMed ID: 30698946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cytocompatibility of 3D printed dental materials for temporary restorations on fibroblasts.
Park JH; Lee H; Kim JW; Kim JH
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):157. PubMed ID: 32487153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
