742 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31794492)
1. Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup?
Wegrzyn J; Malatray M; Pibarot V; Anania G; Béjui-Hugues J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):279-287. PubMed ID: 31794492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Dislocation.
Harwin SF; Mistry JB; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Gwam C; Newman JM; Higuera CA; Bonutti PM; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Delanois RE; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():251-258. PubMed ID: 28395391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Is the Risk of Dislocation and Revision in Proximal Femoral Replacement with Dual-mobility Articulation After Two-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Hip Infection?
Theil C; Schwarze J; Smolle MA; Pützler J; Moellenbeck B; Schneider KN; Schulze M; Klingebiel S; Gosheger G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Sep; 481(9):1792-1799. PubMed ID: 36897193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissociation and Intrapelvic Entrapment of a Dual-mobility Polyethylene Component.
Fehring KA; Berry DJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):1072-6. PubMed ID: 26088765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls).
Huten D; Fournier Y; Gicquel T; Bertho P; Basselot F; Hamadouche M
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 31153859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cementation of a dual-mobility cup into a well-fixed cementless shell in patients with high risk of dislocation undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.
Moreta J; Uriarte I; Foruria X; Urra I; Aguirre U; Martínez-de Los Mozos JL
Hip Int; 2021 Jan; 31(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 31601128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors.
Hernigou P; Roussignol X; Delambre J; Poignard A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
Hartzler MA; Abdel MP; Sculco PK; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA?
Chalmers BP; Pallante GD; Taunton MJ; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 29529660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Dyer C; Graves SE; Bingham R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 34978538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA.
Chughtai M; Mistry JB; Diedrich AM; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Bonutti PM; Harwin SF; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Mont MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2181-7. PubMed ID: 27106128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system.
Philippot R; Boyer B; Farizon F
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Mar; 471(3):965-70. PubMed ID: 23054529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LUMiC
Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High Risk of Neck-liner Impingement and Notching Observed with Thick Femoral Neck Implants in Ceramic-on-ceramic THA.
Kim HS; Park JW; Lee SJ; Lee YK; Ha YC; Koo KH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr; 480(4):690-699. PubMed ID: 34699410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What Is the Survivorship of Revision Surgery Performed for the Chronically Dislocated THA?
Brown TS; McLaughlin RJ; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG; Trousdale RT; Sierra RJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):374-379. PubMed ID: 30794225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up.
Philippot R; Farizon F; Camilleri JP; Boyer B; Derhi G; Bonnan J; Fessy MH; Lecuire F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Dec; 94(8):e23-7. PubMed ID: 19070710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Survival of dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up].
Philippot R; Farizon F; Camilleri JP; Boyer B; Derhi G; Bonnan J; Fessy MH; Lecuire F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Feb; 94(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18342029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.
Hamadouche M; Ropars M; Rodaix C; Musset T; Gaucher F; Biau D; Courpied JP; Huten D
Int Orthop; 2017 Mar; 41(3):513-519. PubMed ID: 27889840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.
Hoskins W; Griffin X; Hatton A; de Steiger RN; Bingham R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 32876424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
