These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31795251)

  • 1. Fattening Pig Farmers' Intention to Participate in Animal Welfare Programs.
    Schukat S; Kuhlmann A; Heise H
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Nov; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 31795251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying the factors impacting on farmers' intention to adopt animal friendly practices.
    Borges JAR; Domingues CHF; Caldara FR; Rosa NPD; Senger I; Guidolin DGF
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Oct; 170():104718. PubMed ID: 31421489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding German Pig Farmers' Intentions to Design and Construct Pig Housing for the Improvement of Animal Welfare.
    Winkel C; von Meyer-Höfer M; Heise H
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 32998317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Farmers' Preferences Regarding the Design of Animal Welfare Programs: Insights from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study in Germany.
    Schröter I; Mergenthaler M
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33807847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors that Influence Farmers' Views on Farm Animal Welfare: A Semi-Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.
    Balzani A; Hanlon A
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Aug; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32872206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Farmers' trust in government and participation intention toward rural tourism through TAM: The moderation effect of perceived risk.
    Yu X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1023280. PubMed ID: 36405175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptance and Feasibility of a Guideline for the Animal Welfare Assessment of Fattening Pigs from Farmers' Point of View.
    Pfeifer M; Koch A; Lensches C; Schmitt AO; Hessel EF
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 32325872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancies between farmers' perceptions and actual animal welfare conditions on commercial pig farms.
    Nadlučnik E; Golinar Oven I; Tomažič I; Plut J; Dovč A; Štukelj M
    Front Vet Sci; 2022; 9():1010791. PubMed ID: 36246308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Study on Farmers' Participation in Environmental Protection in the Context of Rural Revitalization: The Moderating Role of Policy Environment.
    Dong H; Zhang Y; Chen T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. My pigs are ok, why change? - animal welfare accounts of pig farmers.
    Albernaz-Gonçalves R; Olmos G; Hötzel MJ
    Animal; 2021 Mar; 15(3):100154. PubMed ID: 33573976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical analysis of pig welfare levels and their impact on pig breeding efficiency-Based on 773 pig farmers' survey data.
    Li Y; Wu N; Xu R; Li L; Zhou W; Zhou X
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0190108. PubMed ID: 29281694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Relationship between Farmers' Perceptions and Animal Welfare Standards in Sheep Farms.
    Kılıç I; Bozkurt Z
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 26(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 25049916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'Would it sell more pork?' Pig farmers' perceptions of Real Welfare, the welfare outcome component of their farm assurance scheme.
    Hockenhull J; Main DCJ; Mullan S
    Animal; 2019 Dec; 13(12):2864-2875. PubMed ID: 31104650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of farmers' green values in creation of green innovative intention and green technology adoption behavior: Evidence from farmers grain green production.
    Gao R; Zhang H; Gong C; Wu Z
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():980570. PubMed ID: 36312093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of Pig Farmers' and Veterinarians' Perceptions and Intentions to Reduce Antimicrobial Usage in Six European Countries.
    Visschers VH; Backhans A; Collineau L; Loesken S; Nielsen EO; Postma M; Belloc C; Dewulf J; Emanuelson U; Grosse Beilage E; Siegrist M; Sjölund M; Stärk KD
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2016 Nov; 63(7):534-544. PubMed ID: 26890125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Determines Pig Farmers' Epidemic Coping Behaviors: A Qualitative Analysis of Endemically Infected Areas in Relation to African Swine Fever.
    Xu B; Zhou L; Qiu C; Li Y; Zhang W
    Vet Sci; 2021 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 34822639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pig farmers' willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs.
    Peden RSE; Akaichi F; Camerlink I; Boyle LA; Turner SP
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224924. PubMed ID: 31703105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Invited review: Examining farmers' personalities and attitudes as possible risk factors for dairy cattle health, welfare, productivity, and farm management: A systematic scoping review.
    Adler F; Christley R; Campe A
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 May; 102(5):3805-3824. PubMed ID: 30852027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling farmers' intention to use pesticides: An expanded version of the theory of planned behavior.
    Bagheri A; Bondori A; Allahyari MS; Damalas CA
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Oct; 248():109291. PubMed ID: 31352279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the ecological conservation behavior of farmers in payment for ecosystem service programs in eco-environmentally fragile areas using social psychology models.
    Deng J; Sun P; Zhao F; Han X; Yang G; Feng Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Apr; 550():382-390. PubMed ID: 26829672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.