These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31795730)
21. Comparison of kidney-ureter-bladder abdominal radiography and computed tomography scout films for identifying renal calculi. Johnston R; Lin A; Du J; Mark S BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):670-3. PubMed ID: 19694714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital tomosynthesis in the detection of urolithiasis: Diagnostic performance and dosimetry compared with digital radiography with MDCT as the reference standard. Mermuys K; De Geeter F; Bacher K; Van De Moortele K; Coenegrachts K; Steyaert L; Casselman JW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):161-7. PubMed ID: 20566811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detection of urolithiasis: comparison of 100% tube exposure images reconstructed with filtered back projection and 50% tube exposure images reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction. Remer EM; Herts BR; Primak A; Obuchowski NA; Greiwe A; Roesel DM; Purysko AS; Feldman MK; De S; Shah SN; Dong F; Monga M; Baker ME Radiology; 2014 Sep; 272(3):749-56. PubMed ID: 24814177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiation dose reduction for CT assessment of urolithiasis using iterative reconstruction: A prospective intra-individual study. den Harder AM; Willemink MJ; van Doormaal PJ; Wessels FJ; Lock MTWT; Schilham AMR; Budde RPJ; Leiner T; de Jong PA Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):143-150. PubMed ID: 28695359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiation From Kidney-Ureter-Bladder Radiographs Is Not Trivial. Kuebker J; Shuman J; Hsi RS; Herrell SD; Miller NL Urology; 2019 Mar; 125():46-49. PubMed ID: 30528717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ultra-low-dose, low-dose, and standard-dose CT of the kidney, ureters, and bladder: is there a difference? Results from a systematic review of the literature. Rob S; Bryant T; Wilson I; Somani BK Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 27810168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in low-dose abdominal CT for urolithiasis. Botsikas D; Stefanelli S; Boudabbous S; Toso S; Becker CD; Montet X AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 25055268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic Accuracy of Low and Ultra-Low Dose CT for Identification of Urinary Tract Stones: A Systematic Review. Rodger F; Roditi G; Aboumarzouk OM Urol Int; 2018; 100(4):375-385. PubMed ID: 29649823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radiation dose reduction at multidetector CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: how low can we go? Kulkarni NM; Uppot RN; Eisner BH; Sahani DV Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 22891359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Radiation exposure associated with computed tomography for pediatric urolithiasis evaluation: A scoping review of the literature. MacNevin W; Chua M; Kraus MS; Keefe DT J Pediatr Urol; 2024 Jun; 20(3):386-394. PubMed ID: 38521719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Usefulness of low-dose nonenhanced computed tomography with iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: diagnostic performance and agreement between the urologist and the radiologist. Kwon JK; Chang IH; Moon YT; Lee JB; Park HJ; Park SB Urology; 2015 Mar; 85(3):531-8. PubMed ID: 25733262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Do low dose CT-KUBs really expose patients to more radiation than plain abdominal radiographs? Yang B; Suhail N; Marais J; Brewin J Urologia; 2021 Nov; 88(4):362-368. PubMed ID: 33583356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Substantial radiation dose reduction with consistent image quality using a novel low-dose stone composition protocol. Apfaltrer G; Dutschke A; Baltzer PAT; Schestak C; Özsoy M; Seitz C; Veser J; Petter E; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Apfaltrer P World J Urol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):2971-2979. PubMed ID: 31993735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Iterative reconstructions versus filtered back-projection for urinary stone detection in low-dose CT. Winklehner A; Blume I; Winklhofer S; Eberli D; Gnannt R; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1429-35. PubMed ID: 24119356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study. Kim BS; Hwang IK; Choi YW; Namkung S; Kim HC; Hwang WC; Choi KM; Park JK; Han TI; Kang W Acta Radiol; 2005 Nov; 46(7):756-63. PubMed ID: 16372698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Role of compressive sensing technique in dose reduction for chest computed tomography: a prospective blinded clinical study. Khawaja RD; Singh S; Lira D; Bippus R; Do S; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Koehler T; Shepard JA; Kalra MK J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):760-7. PubMed ID: 24834892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) in MDCT Below 2 mSv for the Detection of Urinary Calculi: Diagnostic Accuracy and Image Quality in Comparison to Filtered Back-Projection and 4th Generation Iterative Reconstruction (iDose4). Schmidt-Holtz J; Laqmani A; Butscheidt S; Kurfürst M; Avanesov M; Behzadi C; Spink C; Veldhoen S; Nagel HD; Adam G; Regier M Rofo; 2018 Jul; 190(7):630-636. PubMed ID: 29966156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High-pitch, 120 kVp/30 mAs, low-dose dual-source chest CT with iterative reconstruction: Prospective evaluation of radiation dose reduction and image quality compared with those of standard-pitch low-dose chest CT in healthy adult volunteers. Lim HK; Ha HI; Hwang HJ; Lee K PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211097. PubMed ID: 30677082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest at less than 1 mSv: an ongoing prospective clinical trial of chest CT at submillisievert radiation doses with iterative model image reconstruction and iDose4 technique. Khawaja RD; Singh S; Gilman M; Sharma A; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Padole A; Lira D; Brown K; Shepard JA; Kalra MK J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(4):613-9. PubMed ID: 24651746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 256-MDCT for evaluation of urolithiasis: iterative reconstruction allows for a significant reduction of the applied radiation dose while maintaining high subjective and objective image quality. Veldhoen S; Laqmani A; Derlin T; Karul M; Hammerle D; Buhk JH; Sehner S; Nagel HD; Chun F; Adam G; Regier M J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014; 58(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 24581030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]