These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31795755)

  • 1. Analysis of Covariance in Randomized Experiments with Heterogeneity of Regression and a Random Covariate: The Variance of the Estimated Treatment Effect at Selected Covariate Values.
    Li L; McLouth CJ; Delaney HD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):926-940. PubMed ID: 31795755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomization, matching, and propensity scores in the design and analysis of experimental studies with measured baseline covariates.
    Loux TM
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 25384851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A reduction in between subject variability is not mandatory for selecting a new covariate.
    Lagishetty CV; Vajjah P; Duffull SB
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2012 Aug; 39(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 22767340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of analysing continuous outcomes using final values, change scores and analysis of covariance on the performance of meta-analytic methods: a simulation study.
    McKenzie JE; Herbison GP; Deeks JJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):371-386. PubMed ID: 26715122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Covariate effect on constancy assumption in noninferiority clinical trials.
    Xu S; Barker K; Menon S; D'Agostino RB
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1173-89. PubMed ID: 25036666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of covariate mean differences on the standard error and confidence interval for the comparison of treatment means.
    Liu XS
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):310-9. PubMed ID: 21492135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis.
    Berkey CS; Hoaglin DC; Mosteller F; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 1995 Feb; 14(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 7746979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-STEPP with random effects.
    Wang XV; Cole B; Bonetti M; Gelber RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):312-317. PubMed ID: 29281174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On using summary statistics from an external calibration sample to correct for covariate measurement error.
    Guo Y; Little RJ; McConnell DS
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):165-74. PubMed ID: 22157312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.
    Moerbeek M; van Schie S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27401771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate.
    Knapp G; Hartung J
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2693-710. PubMed ID: 12939780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods for calculating confidence and credible intervals for the residual between-study variance in random effects meta-regression models.
    Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Sep; 14():103. PubMed ID: 25196829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence intervals for the true classification error conditioned on the estimated error.
    Xu Q; Hua J; Braga-Neto U; Xiong Z; Suh E; Dougherty ER
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Dec; 5(6):579-89. PubMed ID: 17121434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of balanced and random allocation in clinical trials: a simulation study.
    Rovers MM; Straatman H; Zielhuis GA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2000; 16(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 11484801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of covariance in randomized trials: More precision and valid confidence intervals, without model assumptions.
    Wang B; Ogburn EL; Rosenblum M
    Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1391-1400. PubMed ID: 31009064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing for treatment effect in covariate-adaptive randomized trials with generalized linear models and omitted covariates.
    Li Y; Ma W; Qin Y; Hu F
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Sep; 30(9):2148-2164. PubMed ID: 33899607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of model-based vs. permutation tests in the HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-term
    Tang X; Heeren T; Westgate PM; Feaster DJ; Fernandez SA; Vandergrift N; Cheng DM
    Trials; 2022 Sep; 23(1):762. PubMed ID: 36076295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of one-stage vs two-stage individual patient data meta-analysis methods: A simulation study.
    Kontopantelis E
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):417-430. PubMed ID: 29786975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An introduction to the full random effects model.
    Yngman G; Bjugård Nyberg H; Nyberg J; Jonsson EN; Karlsson MO
    CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2022 Feb; 11(2):149-160. PubMed ID: 34984855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.