These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31795913)

  • 1. Motivational Effects of Enhanced Expectancies for Motor Learning in Individuals With High and Low Self-Efficacy.
    Ghorbani S; Bund A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2020 Feb; 127(1):263-274. PubMed ID: 31795913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motivational effects of enhancing expectancies and autonomy for motor learning: An examination of the OPTIMAL theory.
    Ghorbani S
    J Gen Psychol; 2019; 146(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 30654726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.
    Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1382-1414. PubMed ID: 26833314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A test of optimal theory on young adolescents' standing long jump performance and motivation.
    Simpson T; Cronin L; Ellison P; Carnegie E; Marchant D
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Aug; 72():102651. PubMed ID: 32721370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning.
    Wulf G; Lewthwaite R; Cardozo P; Chiviacowsky S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):824-831. PubMed ID: 28056637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing performance expectancies through visual illusions facilitates motor learning in children.
    Bahmani M; Wulf G; Ghadiri F; Karimi S; Lewthwaite R
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Oct; 55():1-7. PubMed ID: 28709045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motivational processes from expectancy-value theory are associated with variability in the error positivity in young children.
    Kim MH; Marulis LM; Grammer JK; Morrison FJ; Gehring WJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Mar; 155():32-47. PubMed ID: 27898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Directive and incentive functions of affective action consequences: an ideomotor approach.
    Eder AB; Rothermund K; De Houwer J; Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jul; 79(4):630-49. PubMed ID: 24962237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximal force production requires OPTIMAL conditions.
    Singh H; Hockwald A; Drake N; Avedesian J; Lee SP; Wulf G
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Oct; 73():102661. PubMed ID: 32741751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the impact of error estimation on the effects of self-controlled feedback.
    Barros JAC; Yantha ZD; Carter MJ; Hussien J; Ste-Marie DM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Feb; 63():182-198. PubMed ID: 30580207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. OPTIMAL practice conditions enhance the benefits of gradually increasing error opportunities on retention of a stepping sequence task.
    Levac D; Driscoll K; Galvez J; Mercado K; O'Neil L
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Dec; 56(Pt B):129-138. PubMed ID: 29128736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of reward and punishment on motor learning.
    Sadnicka A; Edwards MJ
    Mov Disord; 2015 Nov; 30(13):1724. PubMed ID: 26256449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Carrot or stick in motor learning.
    Sternad D; Körding KP
    Nat Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 18(4):480-1. PubMed ID: 25811476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit learning of gaze-contingent events.
    Beesley T; Pearson D; Le Pelley M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):800-7. PubMed ID: 25248750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time-event correlation effect is due to temporal expectancy, not to partial transition costs.
    Thomaschke R; Dreisbach G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):196-218. PubMed ID: 25419671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learner-controlled practice difficulty in the training of a complex task: cognitive and motivational mechanisms.
    Hughes MG; Day EA; Wang X; Schuelke MJ; Arsenault ML; Harkrider LN; Cooper OD
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jan; 98(1):80-98. PubMed ID: 22925045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Saving the Perruchet effect: A role for the strength of the association in associative learning.
    Destrebecqz A; Vande Velde M; San Anton E; Cleeremans A; Bertels J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1379-1386. PubMed ID: 29991319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning.
    Pascua LA; Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 24875153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motivation to avoid loss improves implicit skill performance.
    Chon D; Thompson KR; Reber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Feb; 44(2):327-333. PubMed ID: 28933901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reward anticipation modulates primary motor cortex excitability during task preparation.
    Bundt C; Abrahamse EL; Braem S; Brass M; Notebaert W
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():483-488. PubMed ID: 27397625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.